A Neurological Integrated Care Pathway

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Australasian Journal of Neuroscience

Australian Association of Neuroscience Nursing

Subject: Nursing

GET ALERTS

ISSN: 1032-335X
eISSN: 2208-6781

DESCRIPTION

23
Reader(s)
28
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Archive
Volume 31 (2021)
Volume 30 (2020)
Volume 29 (2019)
Volume 28 (2018)
Volume 27 (2017)
Volume 26 (2016)
Volume 25 (2015)
Related articles

VOLUME 26 , ISSUE 1 (May 2016) > List of articles

A Neurological Integrated Care Pathway

Kathleen McCoy * / Harriet Chan

Keywords : integrated care pathway, community neurological support.

Citation Information : Australasian Journal of Neuroscience. Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 38-43, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/ajon-2017-125

License : (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Published Online: 25-January-2018

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the feasibility of service integration for neurological care.
Design: Observation study
Participants: A total of 104 admissions for 92 neurological patients treated in a major region hospital and suitable for discharge home were eligible for participation.
Intervention: A neurological integrated care pathway (NICP) was trialled at a major regional hospital between July 2012 and June 2013. Objective data included patients, gender, age, diagnosis, length of hospital stay, referral dates, discharge dates, dates when patients were seen by the community neurological liaison nurse, and readmissions were collated for analyses.
Outcome measures: Targeted outcomes included the estimated service impact on the hospital in terms of reduced length of hospital stay and decreased readmissions and increased referral rate to community neurological support service, and quality of patient care.
Results: The trial saw an increase in efficiency and standard of care despite growth in patient numbers. The CNLN attended to 104 recorded referrals (more than 17 times the number of referrals in 2011), all within 7 days of their referral date (a 77.4% decrease compared to 2011 where patients were attended to up to 31 days). In addition, the average length of hospital stay had decreased significantly from 26 days in 2011 to 9 days (a 65.4% decrease) with a low rate of re-admission (approximately 11.5%).
Conclusion: The NICP improved service efficiency for both the hospital system and the community neurological support service, with high levels of patient satisfaction. In this case the NICP achieved best value from existing resources and provided a viable model of service delivery for chronic neurological conditions.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

  1. Aspinal, F, Bernard, S, Spiers, G and Parker, G (2014) Outcomes assessment for people with long-term neurological conditions: a qualitative approach to developing and testing a checklist in integrated care. Southampton: NIH Research Unit
  2. Boter, H, Rinkel, G J, de Haan, R J and HESTIA Study Group (2004) ‘Outreach nurse support after stroke: a descriptive study on patients’ and carers’ needs, and applied nursing interventions’, Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol.18, No 2: 156-63
  3. Freeman, J A and Thompson, A J (2000) ‘Community services in multiple sclerosis: still a matter of chance’, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, Vol. 69, No 6: 728-32
  4. Government of Western Australia (2015) ‘Epidemiology profile of neurological conditions in Western Australia 2015’; viewed 30 June 2015, http://www.healthnetworks.health.wa.gov.au/docs/Epidemiology_Report_Final_2015.pdf
  5. Jack, B, Kirton, J, O’Brien, M and Roe, B (2009) ‘Evaluation of the generic neurology nurse service’, Edge Hill University Faculty of Health,viewed 30 June 2015, http://www.edgehill.ac.uk/eprc/files/2011/08/ GenericNeurology_ExecReport.pdf
  6. MacDonald BK, Cockkerall JW, Saner WAS and Shorvon SD (2000). ‘The incidence and lifetime prevalence of neurological disorders in a prospective community-based study in the UK’, Brain, Vol. 123, pp.665-676.  http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/brain/123/4/665.full.pdf
  7. National Health Priority Action Council (NHPAC) (2006) ‘Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing National Chronic Disease Strategy’, viewed 30 June 2015, http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/66EC52273873D375CA257BF0001F3FED/$File/stratal3.pdf
  8. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (2014) ‘Brain Basics: Know Your Brain’; viewed 30 June 2015, http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/brain_basics/know_your_brain.htm
  9. Neurological Council of Western Australia (2015),‘Past to Present’, viewed 30 June 2015, http://www.ncwa.com.au/the-ncwa/past-to-present World Health Organisation (2002) ‘Towards a common language for Functioning, Disability and Health ICF’, World Health Organisation, viewed 30 June 2015, http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf
  10. World Health Organisation (2006) ‘Neurological Disorders: Public Health Challenges’; viewed 30 June 2015, http://www.who.int/mental_health/neurology/neurodiso/en/
  11. World Health Organisation (2014) ‘Online Questions and Answers - What are neurological conditions’;viewed 30 June 2015, http://www.who.int/features/qa/55/en/

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS