AcceleDent Aura does not influence treatment duration or number of visits


Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Australasian Orthodontic Journal

Australian Society of Orthodontists

Subject: Dentistry, Orthodontics & Medicine


ISSN: 2207-7472
eISSN: 2207-7480





Volume / Issue / page

Volume 38 (2022)
Volume 37 (2021)
Volume 36 (2020)
Volume 35 (2019)
Volume 34 (2018)
Volume 33 (2017)
Volume 32 (2016)
Volume 31 (2015)
Related articles

VOLUME 36 , ISSUE 1 (May 2020) > List of articles

AcceleDent Aura does not influence treatment duration or number of visits

Peter Miles * / Nikolaos Pandis

Citation Information : Australasian Orthodontic Journal. Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 2-8, DOI:

License : (CC BY 4.0)

Published Online: 20-July-2021



Background: Many techniques and appliances claim to reduce orthodontic treatment time, one of which is micro-vibration applied by the AcceleDent Aura appliance.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to report compliance with AcceleDent Aura and to assess any effect on treatment duration, number of visits and bond failures.

Methods: Forty Class II adolescent subjects were randomly assigned to use the AcceleDent Aura appliance or no AcceleDent Aura device during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances involving maxillary premolar extractions. Compliance was recorded by the AcceleDent Aura appliance and reported for the first 13 months. Overall treatment duration, the number of visits and number of bond failures were also recorded.

Results: AcceleDent compliance reduced over time from a mean 77.8% usage at the start to a mean of 39.5% by the thirteenth month. There was no difference in the number of bond failures between groups (p = 0.54) and there was no evidence that the use of the Acceledent Aura appliance influenced treatment duration (p = 0.26) or the number of visits (p = 0.56).

Conclusions: The AcceleDent Aura appliance had no significant effect on treatment duration, number of visits or the number of bond failures. Compliance with the appliance waned significantly over time.

Content not available PDF Share



1. Jerrold L. Accelerated orthodontics or accelerated liability? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:S148-51.

2. Darendeliler MA, Zea A, Shen G, Zoellner H. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field vibration on tooth movement induced by magnetic and mechanical forces: a preliminary study. Aust Dent J 2007;52:282-7.

3. Nishimura M, Chiba M, Ohashi T, Sato M, Shimizu Y, Igarashi K et al. Periodontal tissue activation by vibration: intermittent stimulation by resonance vibration accelerates experimental tooth movement in rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:572- 83.

4. Shimizu Y. [Movement of the lateral incisors of the Macaca fuscata as loaded by a vibrating force.] Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi 1986;45:56-72. Japanese.

5. Pavlin D, Anthony R, Raj V, Gakunga PT. Cyclic loading (vibration) accelerates tooth movement in orthodontic patients: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Sem Orthod 2015;21:187–94.

6. Woodhouse NR, DiBiase AT, Johnson N, Slipper C, Grant J, Alsaleh M et al. Supplemental vibrational force during orthodontic alignment: a randomized trial. J Dent Res 2015;94:682-9.

7. DiBiase AT, Woodhouse NR, Papageorgiou SN, Johnson N, Slipper C, Grant J et al. Effects of supplemental vibrational force on space closure, treatment duration, and occlusal outcome: A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:469-80.

8. Miles P, Fisher E. Assessment of the changes in arch perimeter and irregularity in the mandibular arch during initial alignment with the AcceleDent Aura appliance vs no appliance in adolescents: a singleblind randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150:928-36.

9. Miles P. Does Microvibration Accelerate Leveling and Alignment? A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Orthod 2018;52:342-45.

10. Miles P, Fisher E, Pandis N. Assessment of the rate of premolar extraction space closure in the maxillary arch with the AcceleDent Aura appliance vs no appliance in adolescents: A single-blind randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:8-14.

11. Katchooi M, Cohanim B, Tai S, Bayirli B, Spiekerman C, Huang G. Effect of supplemental vibration on orthodontic treatment with aligners: A randomized trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:336-46.

12. Kau CH, Nguyen JT, English JD. The clinical evaluation of a novel cyclical force generating device in orthodontics. Orthodontic Practice 2010;1:10-15.

13. Tsomos G, Ludiwg B, Grossne J, Pazera P, Gkantidis N. Objective assessment of patient compliance with removable orthodontic appliances: a cross-sectional cohort study. Angle Orthod 2014;84:56- 61.

14. Al-Moghrabi D, Salazar FC, Pandis N, Fleming PS. Compliance with removable orthodontic appliances and adjuncts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;152:17- 32.

15. Kacer KA, Valiathan M, Narendran S, Hans MG. Retainer wear and compliance in the first 2 years after active orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:592-8.

16. Schott TC, Meyer-Gutknecht H, Mayer N, Weber J, Weimer K. A comparison between indirect and objective wear-time assessment of removable orthodontic appliances. Europ J Orthod 2017;39:170-5.

17. Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Vogels DS III, Vogels PB. 2014 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, Part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod. 2014;48:607-30.

18. Miles PG. 2013 Survey of Australian Orthodontists’ procedures. Aust Orthod J 2013;29:170-5.

19. Tsichlaki A, Chin SY, Pandis N, Fleming PS. How long does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;149:308-18.