Efficacy of Various Application Methods of Fluensulfone for Managing Root-knot Nematodes in Vegetables

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Journal of Nematology

Society of Nematologists

Subject: Life Sciences

GET ALERTS DONATE

ISSN: 0022-300X
eISSN: 2640-396X

DESCRIPTION

73
Reader(s)
160
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Related articles

VOLUME 48 , ISSUE 2 (June 2016) > List of articles

Efficacy of Various Application Methods of Fluensulfone for Managing Root-knot Nematodes in Vegetables

KELLY A. MORRIS / DAVID B. LANGSTON / RICHARD F. DAVIS / JAMES P. NOE / DON W. DICKSON / PATRICIA TIMPER

Keywords : cucumber, fluensulfone, management, Meloidogyne spp., nematicide, oxamyl, tomato, vegetable crops.

Citation Information : Journal of Nematology. Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 65-71, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2017-010

License : (CC BY 4.0)

Received Date : 28-January-2016 / Published Online: 21-July-2017

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

Fluensulfone is a new nematicide in the flouroalkenyl chemical group. A field experiment was conducted in 2012 and 2013 to evaluate the efficacy of various application methods of fluensulfone for control of Meloidogyne spp. in cucumber (Cucumis
sativus
). Treatments of fluensulfone (3.0 kg a.i./ha) were applied either as preplant incorporation (PPI) or via different drip
irrigation methods: drip without pulse irrigation (Drip NP), pulse irrigation 1 hr after treatment (Drip +1P), and treatment at the
same time as pulse irrigation (Drip =P). The experiment had eight replications per treatment and also included a PPI reatment of oxamyl (22.5 kg a.i./ha) and a nontreated control. Compared to the control, neither the oxamyl nor the fluensulfone PPI treatments reduced root galling by Meloidogyne spp. in cucumber. Among the drip treatments, Drip NP and Drip +1P reduced root galling compared to the control. Cucumber yield was greater in all fluensulfone treatments than in the control. In a growth-chamber experiment, the systemic activity and phytotoxicity of fluensulfone were also evaluated on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), eggplant (Solanum melongena), cucumber, and squash (Curcurbita pepo). At the seedling stage, foliage of each crop was sprayed with fluensulfone at 3, 6, and 12 g a.i./liter, oxamyl at 4.8 g a.i./liter, or water (nontreated control). Each plant was inoculated with Meloidogyne incognita juveniles 2 d after treatment. There were six replications per treatment and the experiment was conducted twice. Foliar applications of fluensulfone reduced plant vigor and dry weight of eggplant and tomato, but not cucumber or squash; application of oxamyl had no effect on the vigor or weight of any of the crops. Typically, only the highest rate of fluensulfone was phytotoxic to eggplant and tomato. Tomato was the only crop tested in which there was a reduction in the number of nematodes or galls when fluensulfone or oxamyl was applied to the foliage compared to the nontreated control. This study demonstrates that control of Meloidogyne spp. may be obtained by drip and foliar applications of fluensulfone; however, the systemic activity of fluensulfone is crop specific and there is a risk of phytotoxicity with foliar applications.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

  1. Back, M. A., Haydock, P. P. J., and Jenkinson, P. 2002. Disease complexes involving plant parasitic nematodes and soilborne pathogens. Plant Pathology 51:683–697.
  2. Barker, K. R., Koenning, S. R., Bostian, A. L., and Ayers, A. R. 1988. Growth and yield responses of soybean to aldicarb. Journal of Nematology 20:421–431.
  3. Buchholz, A., Baur, P., and Schonherr, J. 1998. Differences among plant species in cuticular permeabilities and solute mobilities are not caused by differential size selectivities. Planta 206:322–328.
  4. Byrd, D.W., Jr., Kirkpatrick, T., and Barker, K. R. 1983. An improved technique for clearing and staining plant tissues for detection of nematodes. Journal of Nematology 15:142–143.
  5. Cabrera-Hidalgo, A. J., Moctezuma, E. V., and Mendoza, N. M. 2015. Effect of fluensulfone on the mobility in vitro, and reproduction and root galling of Nacobbus aberrans in microplots. Nematropica 45:59–71.
  6. Davis, R. F., Langston, D., and Boland, B. 2001. Southern root-knot nematode management in carrot, 2000. Fungicide and Nematicide Tests 56:N3.
  7. Garabedian, S., and Hague, N. 1982. Comparison of methods of application of oxamyl for control of Heterodera sacchari on sugarcane plants. Nematropica 12:39–44.
  8. Gugino, B. K., Abawi, G. S., and Ludwig, J. W. 2006. Damage and management of Meloidogyne hapla using oxamyl on carrot in New York. Journal of Nematology 38:483–490.
  9. Hsu, F. C., and Kleier, D. A. 1996. Phloem mobility of xenobiotics VIII. A short review. Journal of Experimental Botany 47:1265–1271.
  10. Jatala, P., and Jensen, H. J. 1974. Oxamyl controls Longidorus elongatus on peppermint in greenhouse experiments. Plant Disease Reporter 58:591–593.
  11. Karmeli, D., and Peri, G. 1974. Basic principles of pulse irrigation. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division 100:309–319.
  12. Karssen, G., Wesemael, W., and Moens, M. 2013. Root-knot nematodes. Pp. 73–108 in R. N. Perry, and M. Moens, eds. Plant nematology. Wallingford, CT: CABI Publishers.
  13. Kearn, J., Ludlow, E., Dillon, J., O’Connor, V., and Holden-Dye, L. 2014. Fluensulfone is a nematicide with a mode of action distinct from and macrocyclic lactones. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 109:44–57.
  14. Langston, D. B., and Sanders, F. H. 2009. Evaluation of thiazonsulfene for suppressing root-knot nematode on cucumbers in , 2008. Plant Disease Management Reports 3:N043.
  15. Langston, D. B., Sanders, H., Tyson, C., and Morris, K. 2014. Evaluation of nematicides for reducing damage of root-knot nematode to carrots in Georgia, 2013. Plant Disease Management Reports 8:N014.
  16. Lawrence, G. W., and McLean, K. S. 2002. Foliar applications of oxamyl with aldicarb for the management of Meloidogyne incognita on cotton. Nematropica 32:103–112.
  17. Morris, K. A., Langston, D. B., Dickson, D.W., Davis, R. F., Timper, P., and Noe, J. P. 2015. Efficacy of fluensulfone in a tomato-cucumber double cropping system. Journal of Nematology 47:310–315.
  18. Oka, Y., Shuker, S., and Tkachi, N. 2009. Nematicidal efficacy of MCW-2, a new nematicide of the fluoroalkenyl group, against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica. Pest Management Science 65:1082–1089.
  19. Oka, Y., Shuker, S., and Tkachi, N. 2012. Systemic nematicidal activity of fluensulfone against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita on pepper. Pest Management Science 68:268–275.
  20. Opperman, C. H., and Chang, S. 1990. Plant-parasitic nematode acetylcholinesterase inhibition by carbamate and organophosphate nematicides. Journal of Nematology 22:481–488.
  21. Peterson, C. A., Dewildt, P. P. Q., and Edgington, L. V. 1978. A rationale for ambimobile translocation of  nematicide oxamyl in plants. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 8:1–9.
  22. Ploeg, A. T., and Becker, J. O. 2013. Efficacy of nematicides for rootknot nematode management in carrot, 2012. Plant Disease Management Reports 7:N021.
  23. Potter, J. W., and Marks, C. F. 1976. Efficacy of oxamyl against Heterodera schachtii on cabbage. Journal of Nematology 8:38–42.
  24. Rich, J. R., and Bird, G. W. 1973. Inhibition of Rotylenchulus reniformis penetration of tomato and cotton roots with foliar applications oxamyl. Journal of Nematology 5:221–224.
  25. Rich, J. R., Dunn, R. A., and Noling, J. W. 2004. Nematicides: Past and present uses. Pp. 1179–1200 in Z. X. Chen, S. Y. Chen, and D. W. Dickson, eds. Nematology advances and perspectives: Nematode management and utilization. Wallingford, CT: CABI Publishing.
  26. Samanidou, V., Fytianos, K., Pfister, G., and Bahadir, M. 1988. Phytochemical decomposition of carbamate pesticides in natural waters of northern Greece. Science of the Total Environment 76:8592.
  27. Santo, G. S., and Bolander, W. J. 1979. Control of Meloidogyne hapla in roots of red currants with foliar applications of oxamyl and phenamiphos.Plant Disease Reporter 63:639–641.
  28. Sikora, R. A., and Fernandez, E. 2005. Nematode parasites of vegetables. Pp. 319–392 in M. Luc, R. A. Sikora, and J. Bridge, J. eds. Plant parasitic nematodes in subtropical and tropical agriculture. Wallingford, CT: CABI Publishing.
  29. Stephan, Z. A., and Trudgill, D. L. 1983. Effect of time of application on the action of foliar sprays of oxamyl on Meloidogyne hapla in tomato. Journal of Nematology 15:96–101.
  30. Wang, C. J., and Liu, Z. Q. 2007. Foliar uptake of pesticides Present status and future challenge. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 87:1–8.
  31. Westphal, A., and Egel, D. S. 2004. Abamectin seed treatment for controlling Meloidogyne incognita in watermelon, 2002. Fungicide and Nematicide Tests 59:ST016.
  32. Wright, D. J., Blyth, A. R. K., and Pearson, P. E. 1980. Behavior of the systemic nematicide oxamyl in plants in relation to control of invasion and development of Meloidogyne incognita. Annals of Applied Biology 96:323–334.
  33. Wright, D. J., and Womack, N. 1981. Inhibition of development of Meloidogyne incognita by root and foliar applications of oxamyl. Annals of Applied Biology 97:297–303.

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS