Biofloc Technology: Emerging Microbial Biotechnology for the Improvement of Aquaculture Productivity

Sign In

  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Polish Journal of Microbiology
  4. Publication Articles
  5. Article

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Polish Journal of Microbiology

Polish Society of Microbiologists

Subject: Microbiology

GET ALERTS

ISSN: 1733-1331
eISSN: 2544-4646

DESCRIPTION

Article Metrics
101
Reader(s)
234
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue / page

Archive
Volume 70 (2021)
Volume 69 (2020)
Volume 68 (2019)
Volume 67 (2018)
Volume 66 (2017)
Volume 65 (2016)
Related articles

VOLUME 69 , ISSUE 4 (Dec 2020) > List of articles

Biofloc Technology: Emerging Microbial Biotechnology for the Improvement of Aquaculture Productivity

MAMDOH T. JAMAL / MOHAMMED BROOM / BANDAR A. AL-MUR / MAMDOUH AL HARBI / MOHAMMED GHANDOURAH / AHMED AL OTAIBI / MD FAZLUL HAQUE *

Keywords : biofloc, BFT, aquaculture, microbes, water quality, wastes

Citation Information : Polish Journal of Microbiology. Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages 401-409, DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2020-049

License : (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Received Date : 17-June-2020 / Accepted: 19-October-2020 / Published Online: 27-December-2020

  • ARTICLE
  • FIGURES & TABLES
  • REFERENCES
  • EXTRA FILES
  • COMMENTS

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

With the significant increases in the human population, global aquaculture has undergone a great increase during the last decade. The management of optimum conditions for fish production, which are entirely based on the physicochemical and biological qualities of water, plays a vital role in the prompt aquaculture growth. Therefore, focusing on research that highlights the understanding of water quality and breeding systems’ stability is very important. The biofloc technology (BFT) is a system that maximizes aquaculture productivity by using microbial biotechnology to increase the efficacy and utilization of fish feeds, where toxic materials such as nitrogen components are treated and converted to a useful product, like a protein for using as supplementary feeds to the fish and crustaceans. Thus, biofloc is an excellent technology used to develop the aquaculture system under limited or zero water exchange with high fish stocking density, strong aeration, and biota. This review is highlighted on biofloc composition and mechanism of system work, especially the optimization of water quality and treatment of ammonium wastes. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of the BFT system have been explained. Finally, the importance of contemporary research on biofloc systems as a figure of microbial biotechnology has been emphasized with arguments for developing this system for better production of aquaculture with limited natural resources of water.

Graphical ABSTRACT

Full Text XML PDF Share

Introduction

The rapid growth of the human population on earth has caused a significant increase in food demand. To meet this demand, the enhancement of animal protein production, which is the main source of nutrition for human consumption, is highly required. Aquaculture is the ideal source of animal proteins, which could be produced at the lowest cost and very fast. Increasing the productivity of aquaculture in vertical and horizontal expansion leads to an excessive increase of pollutants in the surrounding environment (Ahmad et al. 2017). Biofloc technology (BFT) applications are one of the best aquaculture systems and contribute to the achievement of sustainable development and desired objectives for a clean environment (Bossier and Ekasari 2017). Hargreaves (2013) defined the biofloc as “a mixture of algae, bacteria, protozoans and other kinds of particulate organic matter such as feces and uneaten feed in addition to some of zooplankton and nematodes, formed together to be an integrated and interdependent ecosystem”. Moreover, biofloc systems can operate with zero or low water exchange (0.5% to 1% per day) under high stocking density of fish or shrimp, assuring it to be an ideal system for saving water exchange (Hargreaves 2013).

However, fish species such as tilapia and carps, and shrimps such as pink, brine, and pacific whiteleg shrimp that are physiologically adapted to digest microbial protein obtained from biofloc consumption are usually suitable for biofloc systems (Emerenciano et al. 2013; Hargreaves 2013). On the contrary, biofloc systems are not suitable for fish species such as channel catfish and hybrid striped bass as well as for prawns such as giant tiger prawn and giant freshwater prawn. They cannot tolerate low water quality due to the high concentration of solids (Hargreaves 2013; Panigrahi et al. 2019a). Biofloc is generated by adding organic carbon and high aeration, which reduces toxic dissolved nitrogen in the water, where internal waste treatment processes are emphasized and encouraged (Liu et al. 2019). Although it is a potential technology, the data on operational parameters of BFT is still inadequate. Hence, there is an urgent need for more applied research on operational parameters of BFT to optimize the system, such as immunological effects, microbial associated molecular patterns production, and nutrient recycling (Bossier and Ekasari 2017). Hence, this review has been designed to highlight the application of biofloc systems and urge the development of this system to produce more aquaculture products without any pollution to the environment and with limited natural resources of water and land.

Development of biofloc technology as a novel microbial biotechnology

Microbial biotechnology, which deals with applying microorganisms to ensure the security, safety, and usefulness of foods, yielding high-quality products, proper human nutrition, and defense against plant and animal diseases, is still rising with different new technologies for sustainable development in the agricultural field. Nevertheless, uses of microbial biotechnology for sustainable development in aquaculture are critical because of the essential role of microorganisms in the establishment and control of ecosystem facilities, especially nutrient cycling, water quality control, and disease regulation in the culture system (Timmis et al. 2017). Although, several microbial biotechnologies have been applied or are still in the developmental pipeline to increase the productivity in aquaculture by creating the ecofriendly environment to support the growth of other aquatic organisms. These organisms are key agents of pollutant removal and recycling (Bossier and Ekasari 2017; Kabir and Aba 2019; Liu et al. 2019). BFT is one of such novel microbial biotechnologies that has been developed with an excellent ecofriendly technology not only for higher productivity but also for sustainable development (Emerenciano et al. 2017; Abakari et al. 2020a) (Table I). The scientific concepts of BFT grew concomitantly and independently by two groups of researchers. Steve Hopkins led one at the Waddell Mariculture Center, South Carolina, and the other group was led by Avnimelech in Israel (Hopkins et al. 1993; Avnimelech et al. 1994). In both cases, the concepts of active microbial suspension and heterotrophic feed web were used to generate an intensive microbial community for degradation and assimilation of organic residues gathering in the pond in no or limited water exchange condition, which replaced the conventional external biofilter or high water exchange systems in aquaculture (Hopkins et al. 1993; Avnimelech et al. 1994). In BFT, the microbes work for regulation of water quality through the control of nitrogen, resulting in the enhancement of the microbial proteins, which functions as a source of nutrition for aquaculture species. Moreover, the microbes in BFT play a vital role in biosecurity by inhibiting the pathogenic microorganisms’ growth (Emerenciano et al. 2017). For example, heterotrophic bacteria such as Bacillus spp. that were used as probiotics for bio-augmentation of biofloc enhanced immunity in the Indian white shrimp against pathogenic microorganisms resulting in better growth, survival, and productivity of the shrimp (Panigrahi et al. 2020). Similarly, recent improvements in biofloc-dominated, super-intensive, limited-discharge systems for raising Pacific whitelegs prawn ensure higher biosecurity from viral and bacterial disease outbreaks (Samocha et al. 2012; Prangnell et al. 2020). In a study, the polyphenols isolated from the chestnut (Castanea sativa) were supplemented in BFT for the culture of Nile tilapia. It resulted in an enhanced mucosal and serum immunity against pathogenic Streptococcus agalactiae (Van Doan et al. 2020). Likewise, Jaggery-based BFT (Jaggery – a potential source of carbon) provided an eco-friendly environment for better bacterial assimilation and nitrification, resulting in improved water quality (Elayaraja et al. 2020). Similarly, a biochar-based BFT caused improvement of water quality through active heterotrophic bacterial assimilation and nitrification, resulting in enhanced levels of NO–3 and total nitrogen (Abakari et al. 2020b).

Table I

Recent use of biofloc technology (BFT) in fish and prawn culture.

10.33073_pjm-2020-049-tbl1.jpg

Biofloc composition and work mechanism

Successful fish farming is entirely dependent on the physicochemical and biological qualities of water. Consequently, water quality control is required for optimum ponds management (Sharma et al. 2018). Some studies suggest that the ratio between nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) in the water during the period of aquaculture should be controlled by implementing successful biofloc technology (Avnimelech 2009). Thus, the BFT is an integrated system (Fig. 1), and the quality of this system, which depends on the biotic composition of biofloc and the quantity of suspended solids, is checked with Imhoff cones. For checking the biotic composition of biofloc, water collected from the system is reserved in Imhoff cones for precipitation. After 15 minutes of precipitation, we can see the aggregates of heterotrophic bacteria, algae, entangled zooplankton including protozoa, rotifers, diatoms, uneaten feed, other dead organic matter, and the suspended particles, all of which reflect the quality of biofloc (Sharma et al. 2018). Some additives to the water can improve the BFT system; for example, the addition of carbohydrates to reduce toxic ammonia can promote the concentration of microorganisms within the biofloc as well as multiplication of heterotrophic bacteria to enhance the production of proteins and to reduce the growth of pathogenic strains (Panigrahi et al. 2019b).

Fig. 1.

Role of microbial communities in biofloc technology (BFT) to improved water quality and fish yield in freshwater indoor and outdoor pond aquaculture (Liu et al. 2019).

10.33073_pjm-2020-049-f001.jpg

Biofloc is the best system for water utilization and waste treatment

Fish and shrimp ponds contain a high load of nutrients because of the vast amount of feeds. Almost 50–70% of feeds is in the water or in the sediment, thus resulting in water quality deterioration due to the imbalance of carbon and nitrogen in the culture pond. In such fish and shrimp ponds, biofloc technology can improve water quality by balancing carbon and nitrogen in the aquaculture system by photosynthesis and nitrification processes (Crab et al. 2012). It was reported that the optimum ratio of carbon and nitrogen in biofloc could help to maintain the water quality to raise Pacific white leg shrimp in lower salinity for inland culture. In turn, it decreases the possibility of land pollution by the release of saline wastewater from the shrimp pond (Kumar et al. 2019). Furthermore, the biofloc working on enhancement of the physicochemical parameters of water to the optimum range is essential for the proper growth of fishes and shrimp (Sharma et al. 2018). A study reported that mullet (Mugil liza) was able to reduce total suspended solids originating from shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) culture in a BFT system by consumption of solids, but their culture in the same tank caused the decreased growth of shrimp (Holanda et al. 2020). Moreover, in the combined culture of mullet and shrimp, the nitrifying bacterial community could be modified by applying biofloc inoculum (Holanda et al. 2020). Another study revealed that the bacterial community structure in culture water and digestive tracts of shrimp L. vannamei were depended on the environmental factors in the wheat flour-based BFT system. Moreover, the BFT system showed the capacity for adequate recovery and sustainable water quality management without any supplementation of sodium bicarbonate (Kim et al. 2021).

In BFT, heterotrophic bacteria are the most common microbial community members forming the structure of biofloc. Simultaneously, the chemoautotrophic nitrifiers are fewer in number than other types of bacteria, which in turn leads to less efflux of nitrogen to the ecosystem of the pond. Also, actinobacteria stimulate the formation of biofloc and could be necessary for secondary benefits of protecting against fish pathogens. However, they may upsurge the accumulation of off-flavor in the fish flesh and water (Liu et al. 2019). Some additives like glucose, starch, and glycerol are preferred as carbon sources to cultivate the biofloc outdoor, and these carbon sources are not only affecting the microbial community structure and composition but also affect the number of pathogenic bacteria, for example, Vibrio spp. (Wei et al. 2020). Many studies have revealed that heterotrophic microbes are often induced to assimilate total ammonia nitrogen, resulting in the accumulation of comparatively higher nitrate levels in a culture system of biofloc technology (Azim et al. 2008; Nootong et al. 2011; Chen et al. 2019).

Moreover, nitrifying bacteria in biofloc, such as ammonia oxidizers, oxidize ammonia to nitrite, and then nitrite oxidizers, oxidize nitrite to nitrate (Chen et al. 2006). Both nitrite and nitrate can damage aquatic animals’ gill tissue, resulting in problems with respiration and/or higher mortality (Lin and Chen 2001; Kuhn et al. 2010b). Hence, some factors such as temperature, salinity, alkalinity, pH, dissolved oxygen, settling solids, total suspended solids, and orthophosphate have to be monitored continuously and practically in biofloc technology as shown in Table II (Emerenciano et al. 2017). Better water quality in BFT results from a complex interaction among different water parameters. Hence, the demand for more research in this field is increasing day by day to better understand this complex interaction of parameter of water quality to develop the aquaculture production methods.

Table II

The key factors of water quality checked in BFT systems and its optimal and/or normal detected ranges (Emerenciano et al. 2017).

10.33073_pjm-2020-049-tbl2.jpg

Biofloc is a significant food source in the recirculating aquaculture system (RAS)

RAS is a modern aquaculture system that could be applied to nurture fish fingerlings in a biosecurity environment to assist in the production schemes; nevertheless, it is still obscure what kind of RAS could be the best for such activities. A comparative study on the role of RAS and BFT on the growth of Tinca tinca fry revealed that the microbial community in RAS and BFT was different and the microbial diversity was relatively higher in the RAS than in the BFT (Vinatea et al. 2018). In another study, the performance of the BFT versus the RAS on Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus in monoculture and polyculture with giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii was evaluated. It was reported that the BFT offers better growth performance for O. niloticus in monoculture and in polyculture with M. rosenbergii compared to RAS (Hisano et al. 2019).Thus, both RAS and BFT systems play a significant role optimizing the growth performance of aquatic animals resulting in the reduction of their production expenses (Fleckenstein et al. 2018). Nevertheless, fossil fuel-based RAS increases both the operational cost and the bad environmental impact because of its high energy requirements (Badiola et al. 2018). The development of renewable energy-based, more efficient RAS and its integration with other systems could be a favorable choice. Hence, integrating RAS and biofloc systems in aquaculture would be promising to enhance their positive features through combined effects. Moreover, biofloc itself is a protein-rich live natural feed formed as a result of the conversion of unused feed and excreta in an aquaculture system upon exposure to sunlight. In a biofloc system, the loose matrix of mucus, which is secreted by various microbes, assists in linking each floc together, which is bound by electrostatic attraction or filamentous microbes form a large floc. The large flocs, which are easily consumed by fish can be observed by the bare eyes, but the maximum flocs are minute in size ranging from 45 to 250 microns. Some technical studies reported that some aquaculture animals preferred the consumption of microbial biofloc generated in BFT systems instead of consumption of processed biofloc as a feed component (Kuhn et al. 2009; Kuhn et al. 2010a; Anand et al. 2014; Bossier and Ekasari 2017). Moreover, BFT application in larvae culture may provide an easily accessible food source for the larvae of Nile tilapia (O. niloticus) between different feeding times and reduce the possible harmful competition during feeding (Ekasari et al. 2015). Similarly, a marked improvement in the growth of the juveniles of Nile tilapia was observed when they were reared with biofloc and compared with the others in control without biofloc (Durigon et al. 2020). Thus, the better growth performance of the aquaculture animals is resulted from the adequate nutritional value of biofloc, especially for high content of proteins and fat as their dry weight ranges from 25–50% and 0.5–15%, respectively. It is also a good source of vitamins and minerals, particularly phosphorous (Verster 2017). Because of good nutritional quality, the dried biofloc is proposed as an ingredient to replace the fishmeal or soybean partially in the feed for aquaculture; but the availability and diversity of dried biofloc are limited. Moreover, biofloc is also a probiotic source and has a probiotic-like beneficial effect in aquaculture production (Ferreira et al. 2015; Vikaspedia 2019; Jamal et al. 2020). Altogether, in an integrated system of BFT and RAS, excessive feeds which are used for the rapid growth of cultured animals would be converted more efficiently into microbial biomass, which in turn can be consumed as food by the animals resulting in less pollution of water (Choo and Caipang 2015).

Biofloc is a safe, integrated aquaculture system for higher productivity

The high-density fish and shrimp culture usually demand a waste treatment infrastructure, and biofloc is the best waste treatment system. It was revealed that BFT systems could be efficiently applied to upsurge fish production by establishing an encouraging relationship between biofloc and fish density, which showed a higher capacity to recycle nitrogenous waste at high culture densities (4 million fishes per ha) (Park et al. 2017). Moreover, BFT systems are suitable for achieving aquaculture with an intensive aeration, low or no exchange of water, higher stocking densities and organic input, heavy mixing and an additional advantage of the generation of an additional feed source for some species well-suited for these conditions. However, BFT was developed to secure fish rearing ponds from diseases caused by the pathogens available in incoming water (Hargreaves 2013). It was reported that Jaggery-based BFT enhanced the immunity of Nile tilapia against the pathogenic Aeromonas hydrophila infection through upregulation of various immune-cells, immune-related genes and enzymes, and antioxidant capacity. Thus, Jaggery-based BFT was capable of increasing the growth performances and the survival rate of Nile tilapia (Elayaraja et al. 2020). Another study revealed that the probiotic bacteria viz. Bacillus infantis, Bacillus subtilis, Exiguobacterium profundum and Bacillus megaterium isolated from BFT were able to enhance growth performance and survival rate of genetically improved Nile tilapia while cultured in 500 l FRP tank. However, B. subtilis and B. megaterium showed better antioxidant and immunological capacity than the remaining two strains (Menaga et al. 2020). Likewise, the intensive cultivation of Nile tilapia can be established by using water discharged from biofloc systems during the growing period without negative effects on fish survival and productive performance (Gallardo-Collí et al. 2019). The discharge water from the BFT system could be a good source of a healthy microbial community. It was reported that the beneficial microorganisms, which were liable for nitrogen conversion, showed the diverse and dense growth in the water column of intensive, minimal-exchange production systems. Moreover, a part of the beneficial microbiota was linked with particles of biofloc, and the density of these particles could be regulated to some degree to increase production (Ray et al. 2011). A study revealed that the aquaculture performance of the shrimp Marsupenaeus japonicus in a high-intensive, zero exchange farming system was improved by biofloc technology, and this high performance might be related to the biodiversity of microbial flora (Zhao et al. 2012). Furthermore, biofloc particle size has played a vital role in some aquaculture species’ nutritional quality and productivity. It was demonstrated that the combination of BFT with an integrated culture system resulted in lower suspended solids, higher biomass production, enhanced total feed efficiency, and higher nitrogen and phosphorus recovery (Ekasari 2014).

Advantages and strengths of biofloc technology

BFT has many benefits that distinguish it from many other advanced fish farming systems, such as an ecofriendly culture system with zero drain water after culture. BFT is dominated over other systems because of its higher capacity for reduction of environmental impact, improvement of effective use of land and water, maintenance of the suitable quality of water with minimal water usage and exchange within the rearing ponds, and production of protein-rich biofloc as a supplementary feed for aquatic organisms (Reddy 2019). Likewise, Arias-Moscoso et al. (2018) stated that biofloc could ensure clean water and higher biosecurity by reduction of wastewater pollution as well as lowering the risk of introduction and spread of diseases and pathogens. Moreover, BFT enhances survival rate, growth performance, and feed conversion in fish culture systems, urging its application as a more economical alternative to other culture systems. Because of the generation of biofloc as non-costly and adequate feed, BFT also reduces the need to utilize protein-rich feed resulting in the cost-effective production of cultured animals. Thus, BFT also reduces the burden on capturing fisheries to market cheaper food fish and trash fish for the fishmeal industry (Reddy 2019).

Disadvantages and weaknesses of biofloc technology

There are many weaknesses in the biofloc system, such as the urgent need for high aeration and water movement, which leads to the increased energy requirement for mixing and aeration. Furthermore, several disadvantages are also reported for BFT, such as reduced response time because of consumption of dissolved oxygen in the water and higher respiration rates, potential pollution from nitrate accumulation, and the requirement of start-up period and alkalinity supplementation (Reddy 2019). Moreover, the performance of BFT may be inconsistent and dependent on seasonal variation of the daylight period for sunlight-exposed systems (Reddy 2019). Finally, BFT has sown frequent requirements of maintenance, which sometimes may be too expensive.

Conclusions

Biofloc technology is an innovative and effective microbial biotechnology in which toxic materials such as nitrogen components can be treated and converted to a useful product like proteins, which can be used by the fish and crustaceans as supplementary feeds. It is an excellent technique to develop the aquaculture system under limited or zero water exchange with high fish stocking density, vigorous aeration, and biota formed by biofloc. BFT presented aquaculture as a sustainable tool for the environmental, social, and economic issues that synchronize with its growth. So this technique needs to be developed by more researches to keep up and maintain the aquaculture systems in the future.

Conflict of interest

The authors do not report any financial or personal connections with other persons or organizations, which might negatively affect the contents of this publication and/or claim authorship rights to this publication.

References


  1. Abakari G, Luo G, Kombat EO. Dynamics of nitrogenous compounds and their control in biofloc technology (BFT) systems: A review. Aquacult Fish. 2020a;Article in Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2020.05.005
  2. Abakari G, Luo G, Meng H, Yang Z, Owusu-Afriyie G, Kombat EO, Alhassan EH. The use of biochar in the production of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in a biofloc technology system – BFT. Aquacult Eng. 2020b Nov;91:102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2020.102123
    [CROSSREF]
  3. Ahmad I, Babitha Rani AM, Verma AK, Maqsood M. Biofloc technology: an emerging avenue in aquatic animal healthcare and nutrition. Aquacult Int. 2017 Jun;25(3):1215–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016-0108-8
    [CROSSREF]
  4. Anand PSS, Kohli MPS, Kumar S, Sundaray JK, Roy SD, Venkateshwarlu G, Sinha A, Pailan GH. Effect of dietary supplementation of biofloc on growth performance and digestive enzyme activities in Penaeus monodon. Aquaculture. 2014 Jan;418–419:108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.09.051
    [CROSSREF]
  5. Arias-Moscoso JL, Espinoza-Barrón LG, Miranda-Baeza A, Rivas-Vega ME, Nieves-Soto M. Effect of commercial probiotics addition in a biofloc shrimp farm during the nursery phase in zero water exchange. Aquacult Rep. 2018 Aug;11:47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2018.06.001
    [CROSSREF]
  6. Avnimelech Y, Kochva M, Diab S. Development of controlled intensive aquaculture systems with a limited water exchange and adjusted carbon to nitrogen ratio. Isr J Aquacult Bamidgeh. 1994; 46(3):119–131.
  7. Avnimelech Y. Biofloc technology: a practical guide book. Sorrento (USA): World Aquaculture Society; 2009.
  8. Azim ME, Little DC, Bron JE. Microbial protein production in activated suspension tanks manipulating C:N ratio in feed and the implications for fish culture. Bioresour Technol. 2008 Jun; 99(9): 3590–3599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.063
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  9. Badiola M, Basurko OC, Piedrahita R, Hundley P, Mendiola D. Energy use in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS): A review. Aquacult Eng. 2018 May;81:57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2018.03.003
    [CROSSREF]
  10. Bossier P, Ekasari J. Biofloc technology application in aquaculture to support sustainable development goals. Microb Biotechnol. 2017 Sep;10(5):1012–1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12836
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  11. Chen S, Ling J, Blancheton JP. Nitrification kinetics of biofilm as affected by water quality factors. Aquacult Eng. 2006 May;34(3): 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.09.004
    [CROSSREF]
  12. Chen X, Luo G, Meng H, Tan H. Effect of the particle size on the ammonia removal rate and the bacterial community composition of bioflocs. Aquacult Eng. 2019 Aug;86:102001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2019.102001
    [CROSSREF]
  13. Choo HX, Caipang CMA. Biofloc technology (BFT) and its application towards improved production in freshwater tilapia culture. Aquacult Aquarium Conserv Legis. 2015;8(3):362–366.
  14. Crab R, Defoirdt T, Bossier P, Verstraete W. Biofloc technology in aquaculture: beneficial effects and future challenges. Aquaculture. 2012 Aug;356–357:351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.046
    [CROSSREF]
  15. Deb S, Noori MT, Rao PS. Application of biofloc technology for Indian major carp culture (polyculture) along with water quality management. Aquacult Eng. 2020 Nov;91:102106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2020.102106
  16. Durigon EG, Lazzari R, Uczay J, Lopes DLA, Jerônimo GT, Sgnaulin T, Emerenciano MGC. Biofloc technology (BFT): adjusting the levels of digestible protein and digestible energy in diets of Nile tilapia juveniles raised in brackish water. Aquacult Fish. 2020 Jan;5(1):42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2019.07.001
  17. Ekasari J, Rivandi DR, Firdausi AP, Surawidjaja EH, Zairin M Jr, Bossier P, De Schryver P. Biofloc technology positively affects Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) larvae performance. Aquaculture. 2015 Apr;441:72–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.02.019
    [CROSSREF]
  18. Ekasari J. Biofloc technology as an integral approach to enhance production and ecological performance of aquaculture. Ghent (Belgium): Ghent University; 2014.
  19. Elayaraja S, Mabrok M, Algammal A, Sabitha E, Rajeswari MV, Zágoršek K, Ye Z, Zhu S, Rodkhum C. Potential influence of jaggery-based biofloc technology at different C:N ratios on water quality, growth performance, innate immunity, immune-related genes expression profiles, and disease resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020 Dec;107 Pt A:118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2020.09.023
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  20. Emerenciano MGC, Gaxiola G, Cuzon G. Biofloc technology (BFT): a review for aquaculture application and animal food industry. In: Matovic MD, editor. Biomass now-cultivation and utilization. London (UK): IntechOpen; 2013. p. 301–328. https://doi.org/10.5772/53902
  21. Emerenciano MGC, Martínez-Córdova LR, Martínez-Porchas M, Miranda-Baeza A. Biofloc technology (BFT): a tool for water quality management in aquaculture. In: Tutu H, editor. Water Quality. London (UK): IntechOpen; 2017 Jan 18;5:92–109. https://doi.org/10.5772/66416
  22. Ferreira GS, Bolívar NC, Pereira SA, Guertler C, Vieira FN, Mouriño JLP, Seiffert WQ. Microbial biofloc as source of probiotic bacteria for the culture of Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2015 Nov; 448:273–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.06.006
    [CROSSREF]
  23. Fischer H, Romano N, Renukdas N, Egnew N, Sinha AK, Ray AJ. The potential of rearing juveniles of bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus, in a biofloc system. Aquacult Rep. 2020 Jul;17:100398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100398
  24. Fleckenstein LJ, Tierney TW, Ray AJ. Comparing biofloc, clear-water, and hybrid recirculating nursery systems (Part II): Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) production and water quality dynamics. Aquacult Eng. 2018 Aug;82:80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2018.06.006
    [CROSSREF]
  25. Gallardo-Collí A, Pérez-Rostro CI, Hernández-Vergara MP. Reuse of water from biofloc technology for intensive culture of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): effects on productive performance, organosomatic indices and body composition. Int Aquatic Research. 2019 Mar;11(1):43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40071-019-0218-9
    [CROSSREF]
  26. Hargreaves JA. Biofloc production systems for aquaculture. Stoneville (USA): Southern Regional Aquaculture Center; 2013. p. 1–11.
  27. Hisano H, Barbosa PTL, Hayd LA, Mattioli CC. Evaluation of Nile tilapia in monoculture and polyculture with giant freshwater prawn in biofloc technology system and in recirculation aquaculture system. Int Aquatic Research. 2019 Dec;11(4):335–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40071-019-00242-2
    [CROSSREF]
  28. Holanda M, Santana G, Furtado P, Rodrigues RV, Cerqueira VR, Sampaio LA, Wasielesky W Jr, Poersch LH. Evidence of total suspended solids control by Mugil liza reared in an integrated system with pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei using biofloc technology. Aquacult Rep. 2020 Nov;18:100479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100479
  29. Hopkins JS, Hamilton RD, Sandier PA, Browdy CL, Stokes AD. Effect of water exchange rate on production, water quality, effluent characteristics and nitrogen budgets of intensive shrimp ponds. J World Aquacult Soc. 1993 Sep;24(3):304–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.1993.tb00162.x
    [CROSSREF]
  30. Jamal MT, Ahmed Sumon MA, Pugazhendi A, Al Harbi M, Hussain MA, Haque MF. Use of probiotics in commercially important finfish aquaculture. Int J Probiotics Prebiotics. 2020 Apr 07;15(1):7–21. https://doi.org/10.37290/ijpp2641-7197.15:7-21
    [CROSSREF]
  31. Kabir A. Aba M. Biofloc an ultimate solution for sustainable aquaculture in Africa [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 May]. Available from https://aquacultureinafrica.com/?p=1589
  32. Kim Y-S, Kim S-E, Kim S-J, Jung H-K, Park J, Jeon YJ, Kim D-H, Kang J-H, Kim K-H. Effects of wheat flour and culture period on bacterial community composition in digestive tracts of Litopenaeus vannamei and rearing water in biofloc aquaculture system. Aquaculture. 2021;531:735908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735908
  33. Kuhn DD, Boardman GD, Lawrence AL, Marsh L, Flick GJ Jr. Microbial floc meal as a replacement ingredient for fish meal and soybean protein in shrimp feed. Aquaculture. 2009 Nov;296(1–2): 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.07.025
    [CROSSREF]
  34. Kuhn DD, Lawrence AL, Boardman GD, Patnaik S, Marsh L, Flick GJ Jr. Evaluation of two types of bioflocs derived from biological treatment of fish effluent as feed ingredients for Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2010a May;303(1–4): 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.03.001
    [CROSSREF]
  35. Kuhn DD, Smith SA, Boardman GD, Angier MW, Marsh L, Flick GJ Jr. Chronic toxicity of nitrate to Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei: impacts on survival, growth, antennae length, and pathology. Aquaculture. 2010b Nov;309(1–4):109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.09.014
    [CROSSREF]
  36. Kumar A, Reddy A, Rani A, Rathore G, Lakra W, Jayant M. Water quality and nutrient dynamics of biofloc with different C/N ratios in inland saline water. J Animal Res. 2019 Oct 15;9(5):783–791. https://doi.org/10.30954/2277-940X.05.2019.23
  37. Laice LM, Corrêa Filho RAC, Ventura AS, Farias KNN, Silva ALN, Fernandes CE, Silva ACF, Barbosa PTL, de Souza AI, Emerenciano MGC, et al. Use of symbiotics in biofloc (BFT)-based Nile tilapia culture: production performance, intestinal morphometry and hematological parameters. Aquaculture. 2021 Jan;530:735715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735715
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  38. Lin YC, Chen JC. Acute toxicity of ammonia on Litopenaeus vannamei Boone juveniles at different salinity levels. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2001 Apr;259(1):109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(01)00227-1
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  39. Liu H, Li H, Wei H, Zhu X, Han D, Jin J, Yang Y, Xie S. Biofloc formation improves water quality and fish yield in a freshwater pond aquaculture system. Aquaculture. 2019 May;506:256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.03.031
    [CROSSREF]
  40. Menaga M, Felix S, Charulatha M, Gopalakannan A, Mohanasundari C, Boda S. In vivo efficiency of Bacillus sp. isolated from biofloc system on growth, haematological, immunological and antioxidant status of genetically improved farmed tilapia (GIFT). Indian J Exp Biol. 2020;58(10):714–721.
  41. Nootong K, Pavasant P, Powtongsook S. Effects of organic carbon addition in controlling inorganic nitrogen concentrations in a biofloc system. J World Aquacult Soc. 2011 Jun;42(3):339–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2011.00472.x
    [CROSSREF]
  42. Panigrahi A, Das RR, Sivakumar MR, Saravanan A, Saranya C, Sudheer NS, Kumaraguru Vasagam KP, Mahalakshmi P, Kannappan S, Gopikrishna G. Bio-augmentation of heterotrophic bacteria in biofloc system improves growth, survival, and immunity of Indian white shrimp Penaeus indicus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020 Mar;98:477–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2020.01.021
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  43. Panigrahi A, Saranya C, Kumaran M, Das R. Biofloc technology: standard operating procedure. In: Vijayan kk, editor. Biofloc Technology for Nursery and Growout Aquaculture. Chennai (India): Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture; 2019a. p. 22–32.
  44. Panigrahi A, Sundaram M, Chakrapani S, Rajasekar S, Syama Dayal J, Chavali G. Effect of carbon and nitrogen ratio (C:N) manipulation on the production performance and immunity of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) in a biofloc-based rearing system. Aquacult Res. 2019b Jan;50(1):29–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13857
    [CROSSREF]
  45. Park J, Roy LA, Renukdas N, Luna T. Evaluation of a biofloc system for intensive culture of fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas. J World Aquacult Soc. 2017 Aug;48(4):592–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12387
    [CROSSREF]
  46. Prangnell DI, Castro LF, Ali AS, Browdy CL, Samocha TM. The performance of juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei fed commercial diets of differing protein content, in a super-intensive biofloc-dominated system. J Appl Aquacult. 2020 May;25:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454438.2020.1766632
    [CROSSREF]
  47. Ray AJ, Dillon KS, Lotz JM. Water quality dynamics and shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) production in intensive, mesohaline culture systems with two levels of biofloc management. Aquacult Eng. 2011 Nov;45(3):127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2011.09.001
    [CROSSREF]
  48. Reddy J. Biofloc fish farming advantages, Training in India [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 May]. Available from https://www.agrifarming. in/biofloc-fish-farming-advantages-training-in-india
  49. Samocha T, Schveitzer R, Krummenauer D, Morris T. Recent advances in super-intensive, zeroexchange shrimp raceway systems. Global Aquacult Advocate. 2012;15(6):70–71.
  50. Sandoval-Vargas LY, Jiménez-Amaya MN, Rodríguez-Pulido J, Guaje-Ramírez DN, Ramírez-Merlano JA, Medina-Robles VM. Applying biofloc technology in the culture of juvenile of Piaractus brachypomus (Cuvier, 1818): effects on zootechnical performance and water quality. Aquacult Res. 2020 Sep;51(9):3865–3878. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.14734
    [CROSSREF]
  51. Sharma A, Singh R, Bandhana, Sangotra R. Comparison of water quality and composition of bioflocs reared in indoor and outdoor conditions. Int Res J Biol Sci. 2018;7(11):1–9.
  52. Timmis K, de Vos WM, Ramos JL, Vlaeminck SE, Prieto A, Danchin A, Verstraete W, de Lorenzo V, Lee SY, Brüssow H, et al. The contribution of microbial biotechnology to sustainable development goals. Microb Biotechnol. 2017 Sep;10(5):984–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12818
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  53. Van Doan H, Hoseinifar SH, Hung TQ, Lumsangkul C, Jaturasitha S, Ehab El-Haroun, Paolucci M. Dietary inclusion of chestnut (Castanea sativa) polyphenols to Nile tilapia reared in biofloc technology: impacts on growth, immunity, and disease resistance against Streptococcus agalactiae. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020 Oct;105:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2020.07.010
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  54. Verster N. Comparison of growth rates of tilapia species (Oreochromis mossambicus and Oreochromis niloticus) raised in a biofloc and a standard recirculating. Ghent (Belgium): Ghent University; 2017.
  55. Vikaspedia. Biofloc culture [Internet]. Hyderabad (India): Vikaspedia; 2019 [cited 2020 May]. Available from https://vikaspedia. in/agriculture/fisheries/fish-production/culture-fisheries/types-of-aquaculture/biofloc
  56. Vinatea L, Malpartida J, Carbó R, Andree KB, Gisbert E, Estévez A. A comparison of recirculation aquaculture systems versus biofloc technology culture system for on-growing of fry of Tinca tinca (Cyprinidae) and fry of grey Mugil cephalus (Mugilidae). Aquaculture. 2018 Jan;482:155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.09.041
    [CROSSREF]
  57. Wei Y, Wang A, Liao S. Effect of different carbon sources on microbial community structure and composition of ex-situ biofloc formation. Aquaculture. 2020 Jan;515:734492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734492
  58. Xu W, Xu Y, Su H, Hu X, Xu Y, Li Z, Wen G, Cao Y. Production performance, inorganic nitrogen control and bacterial community characteristics in a controlled biofloc-based system for indoor and outdoor super-intensive culture of Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2021 Jan;531:735749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735749
    [PUBMED]
  59. Yu Z, Huang ZQ, Du HL, Li HJ, Wu LF. Influence of differential protein levels of feed on growth, copper-induced immune response and oxidative stress of Rhynchocypris lagowski in a biofloc-based system. Aquacult Nutr. 2020 Dec;26(6):2211–2224. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.13158
    [CROSSREF]
  60. Zhao P, Huang J, Wang XH, Song XL, Yang CH, Zhang XG, Wang GC. The application of bioflocs technology in high-intensive, zero exchange farming systems of Marsupenaeus japonicus. Aquaculture. 2012 Jul;354–355:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.03.034
    [CROSSREF]
XML PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

Fig. 1.

Role of microbial communities in biofloc technology (BFT) to improved water quality and fish yield in freshwater indoor and outdoor pond aquaculture (Liu et al. 2019).

Full Size   |   Slide (.pptx)

Full Size   |   Slide (.pptx)

Full Size   |   Slide (.pptx)

REFERENCES

  1. Abakari G, Luo G, Kombat EO. Dynamics of nitrogenous compounds and their control in biofloc technology (BFT) systems: A review. Aquacult Fish. 2020a;Article in Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2020.05.005
  2. Abakari G, Luo G, Meng H, Yang Z, Owusu-Afriyie G, Kombat EO, Alhassan EH. The use of biochar in the production of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in a biofloc technology system – BFT. Aquacult Eng. 2020b Nov;91:102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2020.102123
    [CROSSREF]
  3. Ahmad I, Babitha Rani AM, Verma AK, Maqsood M. Biofloc technology: an emerging avenue in aquatic animal healthcare and nutrition. Aquacult Int. 2017 Jun;25(3):1215–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016-0108-8
    [CROSSREF]
  4. Anand PSS, Kohli MPS, Kumar S, Sundaray JK, Roy SD, Venkateshwarlu G, Sinha A, Pailan GH. Effect of dietary supplementation of biofloc on growth performance and digestive enzyme activities in Penaeus monodon. Aquaculture. 2014 Jan;418–419:108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.09.051
    [CROSSREF]
  5. Arias-Moscoso JL, Espinoza-Barrón LG, Miranda-Baeza A, Rivas-Vega ME, Nieves-Soto M. Effect of commercial probiotics addition in a biofloc shrimp farm during the nursery phase in zero water exchange. Aquacult Rep. 2018 Aug;11:47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2018.06.001
    [CROSSREF]
  6. Avnimelech Y, Kochva M, Diab S. Development of controlled intensive aquaculture systems with a limited water exchange and adjusted carbon to nitrogen ratio. Isr J Aquacult Bamidgeh. 1994; 46(3):119–131.
  7. Avnimelech Y. Biofloc technology: a practical guide book. Sorrento (USA): World Aquaculture Society; 2009.
  8. Azim ME, Little DC, Bron JE. Microbial protein production in activated suspension tanks manipulating C:N ratio in feed and the implications for fish culture. Bioresour Technol. 2008 Jun; 99(9): 3590–3599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.063
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  9. Badiola M, Basurko OC, Piedrahita R, Hundley P, Mendiola D. Energy use in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS): A review. Aquacult Eng. 2018 May;81:57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2018.03.003
    [CROSSREF]
  10. Bossier P, Ekasari J. Biofloc technology application in aquaculture to support sustainable development goals. Microb Biotechnol. 2017 Sep;10(5):1012–1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12836
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  11. Chen S, Ling J, Blancheton JP. Nitrification kinetics of biofilm as affected by water quality factors. Aquacult Eng. 2006 May;34(3): 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.09.004
    [CROSSREF]
  12. Chen X, Luo G, Meng H, Tan H. Effect of the particle size on the ammonia removal rate and the bacterial community composition of bioflocs. Aquacult Eng. 2019 Aug;86:102001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2019.102001
    [CROSSREF]
  13. Choo HX, Caipang CMA. Biofloc technology (BFT) and its application towards improved production in freshwater tilapia culture. Aquacult Aquarium Conserv Legis. 2015;8(3):362–366.
  14. Crab R, Defoirdt T, Bossier P, Verstraete W. Biofloc technology in aquaculture: beneficial effects and future challenges. Aquaculture. 2012 Aug;356–357:351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.046
    [CROSSREF]
  15. Deb S, Noori MT, Rao PS. Application of biofloc technology for Indian major carp culture (polyculture) along with water quality management. Aquacult Eng. 2020 Nov;91:102106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2020.102106
  16. Durigon EG, Lazzari R, Uczay J, Lopes DLA, Jerônimo GT, Sgnaulin T, Emerenciano MGC. Biofloc technology (BFT): adjusting the levels of digestible protein and digestible energy in diets of Nile tilapia juveniles raised in brackish water. Aquacult Fish. 2020 Jan;5(1):42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2019.07.001
  17. Ekasari J, Rivandi DR, Firdausi AP, Surawidjaja EH, Zairin M Jr, Bossier P, De Schryver P. Biofloc technology positively affects Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) larvae performance. Aquaculture. 2015 Apr;441:72–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.02.019
    [CROSSREF]
  18. Ekasari J. Biofloc technology as an integral approach to enhance production and ecological performance of aquaculture. Ghent (Belgium): Ghent University; 2014.
  19. Elayaraja S, Mabrok M, Algammal A, Sabitha E, Rajeswari MV, Zágoršek K, Ye Z, Zhu S, Rodkhum C. Potential influence of jaggery-based biofloc technology at different C:N ratios on water quality, growth performance, innate immunity, immune-related genes expression profiles, and disease resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020 Dec;107 Pt A:118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2020.09.023
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  20. Emerenciano MGC, Gaxiola G, Cuzon G. Biofloc technology (BFT): a review for aquaculture application and animal food industry. In: Matovic MD, editor. Biomass now-cultivation and utilization. London (UK): IntechOpen; 2013. p. 301–328. https://doi.org/10.5772/53902
  21. Emerenciano MGC, Martínez-Córdova LR, Martínez-Porchas M, Miranda-Baeza A. Biofloc technology (BFT): a tool for water quality management in aquaculture. In: Tutu H, editor. Water Quality. London (UK): IntechOpen; 2017 Jan 18;5:92–109. https://doi.org/10.5772/66416
  22. Ferreira GS, Bolívar NC, Pereira SA, Guertler C, Vieira FN, Mouriño JLP, Seiffert WQ. Microbial biofloc as source of probiotic bacteria for the culture of Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2015 Nov; 448:273–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.06.006
    [CROSSREF]
  23. Fischer H, Romano N, Renukdas N, Egnew N, Sinha AK, Ray AJ. The potential of rearing juveniles of bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus, in a biofloc system. Aquacult Rep. 2020 Jul;17:100398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100398
  24. Fleckenstein LJ, Tierney TW, Ray AJ. Comparing biofloc, clear-water, and hybrid recirculating nursery systems (Part II): Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) production and water quality dynamics. Aquacult Eng. 2018 Aug;82:80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2018.06.006
    [CROSSREF]
  25. Gallardo-Collí A, Pérez-Rostro CI, Hernández-Vergara MP. Reuse of water from biofloc technology for intensive culture of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): effects on productive performance, organosomatic indices and body composition. Int Aquatic Research. 2019 Mar;11(1):43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40071-019-0218-9
    [CROSSREF]
  26. Hargreaves JA. Biofloc production systems for aquaculture. Stoneville (USA): Southern Regional Aquaculture Center; 2013. p. 1–11.
  27. Hisano H, Barbosa PTL, Hayd LA, Mattioli CC. Evaluation of Nile tilapia in monoculture and polyculture with giant freshwater prawn in biofloc technology system and in recirculation aquaculture system. Int Aquatic Research. 2019 Dec;11(4):335–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40071-019-00242-2
    [CROSSREF]
  28. Holanda M, Santana G, Furtado P, Rodrigues RV, Cerqueira VR, Sampaio LA, Wasielesky W Jr, Poersch LH. Evidence of total suspended solids control by Mugil liza reared in an integrated system with pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei using biofloc technology. Aquacult Rep. 2020 Nov;18:100479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100479
  29. Hopkins JS, Hamilton RD, Sandier PA, Browdy CL, Stokes AD. Effect of water exchange rate on production, water quality, effluent characteristics and nitrogen budgets of intensive shrimp ponds. J World Aquacult Soc. 1993 Sep;24(3):304–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.1993.tb00162.x
    [CROSSREF]
  30. Jamal MT, Ahmed Sumon MA, Pugazhendi A, Al Harbi M, Hussain MA, Haque MF. Use of probiotics in commercially important finfish aquaculture. Int J Probiotics Prebiotics. 2020 Apr 07;15(1):7–21. https://doi.org/10.37290/ijpp2641-7197.15:7-21
    [CROSSREF]
  31. Kabir A. Aba M. Biofloc an ultimate solution for sustainable aquaculture in Africa [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 May]. Available from https://aquacultureinafrica.com/?p=1589
  32. Kim Y-S, Kim S-E, Kim S-J, Jung H-K, Park J, Jeon YJ, Kim D-H, Kang J-H, Kim K-H. Effects of wheat flour and culture period on bacterial community composition in digestive tracts of Litopenaeus vannamei and rearing water in biofloc aquaculture system. Aquaculture. 2021;531:735908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735908
  33. Kuhn DD, Boardman GD, Lawrence AL, Marsh L, Flick GJ Jr. Microbial floc meal as a replacement ingredient for fish meal and soybean protein in shrimp feed. Aquaculture. 2009 Nov;296(1–2): 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.07.025
    [CROSSREF]
  34. Kuhn DD, Lawrence AL, Boardman GD, Patnaik S, Marsh L, Flick GJ Jr. Evaluation of two types of bioflocs derived from biological treatment of fish effluent as feed ingredients for Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2010a May;303(1–4): 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.03.001
    [CROSSREF]
  35. Kuhn DD, Smith SA, Boardman GD, Angier MW, Marsh L, Flick GJ Jr. Chronic toxicity of nitrate to Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei: impacts on survival, growth, antennae length, and pathology. Aquaculture. 2010b Nov;309(1–4):109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.09.014
    [CROSSREF]
  36. Kumar A, Reddy A, Rani A, Rathore G, Lakra W, Jayant M. Water quality and nutrient dynamics of biofloc with different C/N ratios in inland saline water. J Animal Res. 2019 Oct 15;9(5):783–791. https://doi.org/10.30954/2277-940X.05.2019.23
  37. Laice LM, Corrêa Filho RAC, Ventura AS, Farias KNN, Silva ALN, Fernandes CE, Silva ACF, Barbosa PTL, de Souza AI, Emerenciano MGC, et al. Use of symbiotics in biofloc (BFT)-based Nile tilapia culture: production performance, intestinal morphometry and hematological parameters. Aquaculture. 2021 Jan;530:735715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735715
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  38. Lin YC, Chen JC. Acute toxicity of ammonia on Litopenaeus vannamei Boone juveniles at different salinity levels. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2001 Apr;259(1):109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(01)00227-1
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  39. Liu H, Li H, Wei H, Zhu X, Han D, Jin J, Yang Y, Xie S. Biofloc formation improves water quality and fish yield in a freshwater pond aquaculture system. Aquaculture. 2019 May;506:256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.03.031
    [CROSSREF]
  40. Menaga M, Felix S, Charulatha M, Gopalakannan A, Mohanasundari C, Boda S. In vivo efficiency of Bacillus sp. isolated from biofloc system on growth, haematological, immunological and antioxidant status of genetically improved farmed tilapia (GIFT). Indian J Exp Biol. 2020;58(10):714–721.
  41. Nootong K, Pavasant P, Powtongsook S. Effects of organic carbon addition in controlling inorganic nitrogen concentrations in a biofloc system. J World Aquacult Soc. 2011 Jun;42(3):339–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2011.00472.x
    [CROSSREF]
  42. Panigrahi A, Das RR, Sivakumar MR, Saravanan A, Saranya C, Sudheer NS, Kumaraguru Vasagam KP, Mahalakshmi P, Kannappan S, Gopikrishna G. Bio-augmentation of heterotrophic bacteria in biofloc system improves growth, survival, and immunity of Indian white shrimp Penaeus indicus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020 Mar;98:477–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2020.01.021
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  43. Panigrahi A, Saranya C, Kumaran M, Das R. Biofloc technology: standard operating procedure. In: Vijayan kk, editor. Biofloc Technology for Nursery and Growout Aquaculture. Chennai (India): Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture; 2019a. p. 22–32.
  44. Panigrahi A, Sundaram M, Chakrapani S, Rajasekar S, Syama Dayal J, Chavali G. Effect of carbon and nitrogen ratio (C:N) manipulation on the production performance and immunity of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) in a biofloc-based rearing system. Aquacult Res. 2019b Jan;50(1):29–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13857
    [CROSSREF]
  45. Park J, Roy LA, Renukdas N, Luna T. Evaluation of a biofloc system for intensive culture of fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas. J World Aquacult Soc. 2017 Aug;48(4):592–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12387
    [CROSSREF]
  46. Prangnell DI, Castro LF, Ali AS, Browdy CL, Samocha TM. The performance of juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei fed commercial diets of differing protein content, in a super-intensive biofloc-dominated system. J Appl Aquacult. 2020 May;25:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454438.2020.1766632
    [CROSSREF]
  47. Ray AJ, Dillon KS, Lotz JM. Water quality dynamics and shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) production in intensive, mesohaline culture systems with two levels of biofloc management. Aquacult Eng. 2011 Nov;45(3):127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2011.09.001
    [CROSSREF]
  48. Reddy J. Biofloc fish farming advantages, Training in India [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 May]. Available from https://www.agrifarming. in/biofloc-fish-farming-advantages-training-in-india
  49. Samocha T, Schveitzer R, Krummenauer D, Morris T. Recent advances in super-intensive, zeroexchange shrimp raceway systems. Global Aquacult Advocate. 2012;15(6):70–71.
  50. Sandoval-Vargas LY, Jiménez-Amaya MN, Rodríguez-Pulido J, Guaje-Ramírez DN, Ramírez-Merlano JA, Medina-Robles VM. Applying biofloc technology in the culture of juvenile of Piaractus brachypomus (Cuvier, 1818): effects on zootechnical performance and water quality. Aquacult Res. 2020 Sep;51(9):3865–3878. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.14734
    [CROSSREF]
  51. Sharma A, Singh R, Bandhana, Sangotra R. Comparison of water quality and composition of bioflocs reared in indoor and outdoor conditions. Int Res J Biol Sci. 2018;7(11):1–9.
  52. Timmis K, de Vos WM, Ramos JL, Vlaeminck SE, Prieto A, Danchin A, Verstraete W, de Lorenzo V, Lee SY, Brüssow H, et al. The contribution of microbial biotechnology to sustainable development goals. Microb Biotechnol. 2017 Sep;10(5):984–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12818
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  53. Van Doan H, Hoseinifar SH, Hung TQ, Lumsangkul C, Jaturasitha S, Ehab El-Haroun, Paolucci M. Dietary inclusion of chestnut (Castanea sativa) polyphenols to Nile tilapia reared in biofloc technology: impacts on growth, immunity, and disease resistance against Streptococcus agalactiae. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020 Oct;105:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2020.07.010
    [PUBMED] [CROSSREF]
  54. Verster N. Comparison of growth rates of tilapia species (Oreochromis mossambicus and Oreochromis niloticus) raised in a biofloc and a standard recirculating. Ghent (Belgium): Ghent University; 2017.
  55. Vikaspedia. Biofloc culture [Internet]. Hyderabad (India): Vikaspedia; 2019 [cited 2020 May]. Available from https://vikaspedia. in/agriculture/fisheries/fish-production/culture-fisheries/types-of-aquaculture/biofloc
  56. Vinatea L, Malpartida J, Carbó R, Andree KB, Gisbert E, Estévez A. A comparison of recirculation aquaculture systems versus biofloc technology culture system for on-growing of fry of Tinca tinca (Cyprinidae) and fry of grey Mugil cephalus (Mugilidae). Aquaculture. 2018 Jan;482:155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.09.041
    [CROSSREF]
  57. Wei Y, Wang A, Liao S. Effect of different carbon sources on microbial community structure and composition of ex-situ biofloc formation. Aquaculture. 2020 Jan;515:734492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734492
  58. Xu W, Xu Y, Su H, Hu X, Xu Y, Li Z, Wen G, Cao Y. Production performance, inorganic nitrogen control and bacterial community characteristics in a controlled biofloc-based system for indoor and outdoor super-intensive culture of Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2021 Jan;531:735749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735749
    [PUBMED]
  59. Yu Z, Huang ZQ, Du HL, Li HJ, Wu LF. Influence of differential protein levels of feed on growth, copper-induced immune response and oxidative stress of Rhynchocypris lagowski in a biofloc-based system. Aquacult Nutr. 2020 Dec;26(6):2211–2224. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.13158
    [CROSSREF]
  60. Zhao P, Huang J, Wang XH, Song XL, Yang CH, Zhang XG, Wang GC. The application of bioflocs technology in high-intensive, zero exchange farming systems of Marsupenaeus japonicus. Aquaculture. 2012 Jul;354–355:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.03.034
    [CROSSREF]

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS