research-article | 07-January-2020
III.The evaluation of the consistency of comparisons in pairs – within the AHP procedure there is a possibility to evaluate the consequences of comparisons in pairs, which can be made with the index of inconsistencies and the coefficient of inconsistency.
IV.Preparation of the final ranking of decision variants – the last stage of the multi-criteria analysis constitutes a ranking of the considered decision variants due to their participation in the implementation of the defined
Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment, Volume 12 , ISSUE 4, 23–36
Article | 18-June-2020
Transport Problems, Volume 15 , ISSUE 2, 45–57
Article | 26-March-2020
this research show the most preferable option for distribution according to the customer’s preference and according to the results of the multi-criteria analysis by TOPSIS.
Transport Problems, Volume 15 , ISSUE 1, 5–14
Research Article | 14-February-2019
The paper is focused on the proposal regarding the regional transport organization within Integrated Transport System in a given territory using the selected multi-criteria analysis methods. Introductory parts of this research study include basic information related to this topic as well as description of the current state of the public passenger transport operation, specifically the Integrated Transport System, on a particular territory. Subsequent part of the paper consists of specification
Transport Problems, Volume 13 , ISSUE 4, 115–125
Article | 30-September-2021
Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) methodology used aims to evaluate differences in criteria between stakeholders. The selection of alternatives for all stakeholders uses two calculation methods or scenarios, namely, the similarity of weight for all stakeholders as scenario I and weighting the number of criteria considered by stakeholders in determining the alternative chosen trace as scenario II. The result of the selected alternative calculation is different between scenario I and scenario II.
Heru Purboyo Hidayat PUTRO,
Transport Problems, Volume 16 , ISSUE 3, 77–87