Search

  • Select Article Type
  • Abstract Supplements
  • Blood Group Review
  • Call to Arms
  • Hypothesis
  • In Memoriam
  • Interview
  • Introduction
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Short Report
  • abstract
  • Abstracts
  • Article
  • book-review
  • case-report
  • case-study
  • Clinical Practice
  • Commentary
  • Conference Presentation
  • conference-report
  • congress-report
  • Correction
  • critical-appraisal
  • Editorial
  • Editorial Comment
  • Erratum
  • Events
  • Letter
  • Letter to Editor
  • mini-review
  • minireview
  • News
  • non-scientific
  • Obituary
  • original-paper
  • original-report
  • Original Research
  • Pictorial Review
  • Position Paper
  • Practice Report
  • Preface
  • Preliminary report
  • Product Review
  • rapid-communication
  • Report
  • research-article
  • Research Communicate
  • research-paper
  • Research Report
  • Review
  • review -article
  • review-article
  • review-paper
  • Review Paper
  • Sampling Methods
  • Scientific Commentary
  • short-communication
  • short-report
  • Student Essay
  • Varia
  • Welome
  • Select Journal
  • Journal Of Nematology

 

research-article | 30-November-2019

Evaluation of fluopyram for the control of Ditylenchus dipsaci in sugar beet

the D. dipsaci fourth-stage juveniles (J4) to survive for many years in soil or plant debris (Fielding, 1951), management of this nematode is challenging. Since 2016, the Swiss Federal Office for Agriculture has been implementing an exemption on the use of fluopyram on D. dipsaci infected sugar beet fields. Fluopyram is a succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor fungicide inhibiting fungal respiration (Avenot et al., 2012). The fungicide activity spectrum of fluopyram includes a number of pathogens

Alan Storelli, Andreas Keiser, Reinhard Eder, Samuel Jenni, Sebastian Kiewnick

Journal of Nematology, Volume 52 , 1–10

research-article | 30-November-2019

Mixtures of fluopyram and abamectin for management of Meloidogyne incognita in tomato

fumigants. However, the use of fumigants such as methyl bromide and 1,3-dichloropropene is now banned or restricted (Giannakou et al., 2005). Some non-fumigant nematicides, such as aldicarb and carbofuran, are restricted because of their high mammalian toxicity and environmental risks (Shi et al., 2019). Although current agricultural, physical, and biological control measures are used alone or in combination, the RKN is not effectively controlled in China. Fluopyram, a systemic pesticide used for the

Qing-Qing Li, Jing-Jing Li, Qi-Tong Yu, Ze-Yu Shang, Chao-Bin Xue

Journal of Nematology, Volume 52 , 1–11

research-article | 30-November-2018

Movement of seed- and soil-applied fluopyram in soil columns

additional equipment and have higher production cost than nonfumigants. Nonfumigant nematicides applied to seed and soil are widely used in row crop agriculture. During the past 20 years there has been a general trend to market nonfumigant nematicides that have a lower risk to human safety and impact to non-target organisms. Currently, one such nematicide being evaluated for use in cotton and soybean is fluopyram. Fluopyram is classified as a succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor fungicide that is used

Travis R. Faske, Katherine Brown

Journal of Nematology, Volume 51 , 1–8

research-article | 30-November-2019

Effect of seed-applied fluopyram on Meloidogyne incognita infection and maturity in cotton and soybean

use of seed-applied nematicides have increased in row crop agriculture. One of the more recent nematicides registered (2014) for use in cotton and soybean is fluopyram (Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2014). Fluopyram is a succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor fungicide that has been reported to affect the motility of M. incognita and other plant-parasitic nematodes (Faske and Hurd, 2015; Heiken, 2017; Beeman and Tylka, 2018). However, the field efficacy of fluopyram has been variable in M

Tracy Hawk, Travis R. Faske

Journal of Nematology, Volume 52 , 1–7

research-article | 06-March-2021

Effects of fluopyram and azadirachtin integration with sunn hemp on nematode communities in zucchini, tomato and sweet potato in Hawaii

) nematodes. On vegetable and tomato crops, nematode infestations result in stunting and poor yields. In a nematode-infested sweet potato field, poor plant growth and the deformity of the tubers are common. Environmental conditions in Hawaii are conducive for year-round nematode growth and reproduction. With limited post-plant nematode management options for disrupting the nematode life cycle, the application of chemical or biological nematicides through chemigation is often needed. Fluopyram, first

Philip Waisen, Koon-Hui Wang, Jensen Uyeda, Roxana Y. Myers

Journal of Nematology, Volume 53 , 1–15

research-article | 30-November-2020

Meloidogyne incognita management by nematicides in tomato production

restrictions have left oxamyl, a carbamate, as the remaining non-fumigant nematicide among older chemistry classes still labelled for tomato production in the United States. Because of the reliance on a small selection of older nematicides, the development of new tools for SRKN management is important. One group of new tools are the benzamide, non-fumigant nematicides, such as fluopyram. Fluopyram is a succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) that was first used as a fungicide (Cordova et al., 2017; Kandel

Zane J. Grabau, Chang Liu, Rebeca Sandoval-Ruiz

Journal of Nematology, Volume 53 , 1–12

research-article | 16-April-2020

Nematicide efficacy at managing Meloidogyne arenaria and non-target effects on free-living nematodes in peanut production

., 2002). Recently, a newer chemistry, fluopyram, became available in peanut production. Fluopyram is a benzamide, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor and was originally used as a fungicide. Nematicidal or nematistatic activity of fluopyram against Meloidgyne incognita (southern root-knot nematode (SRKN)) has been demonstrated in vitro (Faske and Hurd, 2015; Ji et al., 2019; Oka and Saroya, 2019). Fluopyram has managed SRKN, to varying degrees, on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) in greenhouse tests (Silva

Zane J. Grabau, Mark D. Mauldin, Alemayehu Habteweld, Ethan T. Carter

Journal of Nematology, Volume 52 , 1–10

research-article | 30-November-2020

The impact of chemical nematicides on entomopathogenic nematode survival and infectivity

soil studies have not been addressed. Our objectives, herein, were to investigate the effects of four nematicidal compounds viz. fluopyram, metam potassium, fosthiazate, and fenamiphos on S. carpocapsae and H. bacteriophora survival, virulence, and penetration efficacy after exposure to nematicides in aqueous suspensions as well as in nematicide-treated soil. A novel assay measuring chemotaxis was also conducted. In addition, we included the plant-parasitic nematode (PPN) Meloidogyne incognita, for

Mustapha Touray, Harun Cimen, Sebnem H. Gulsen, Derya Ulug, Dolunay Erdogus, David Shapiro-Ilan, Selcuk Hazir

Journal of Nematology, Volume 53 , 1–17

research-article | 15-April-2019

Nematicide effects on non-target nematodes in bermudagrass

Protection, Raleigh, NC), furfural (MultiGuard EC; Agriguard, Cranford, NJ), fluopyram (Indemnify; Bayer CropScience, Raleigh, NC), and fluensulfone (Nimitz Pro G; ADAMA Agricultural Solutions, Tel Aviv, Israel). Rates were based on the maximum allowable rate as listed on each label (Table 1). Table 1 Nematicide formulations used in the field study and their per-application labeled application rates. Active Ingredient (a.i.) Trade name Application rate Formulation Abamectin Divanem 0.89

Benjamin D. Waldo, Zane J. Grabau, Tesfamariam M. Mengistu, William T. Crow

Journal of Nematology, Volume 51 , 1–12

research-article | 16-April-2020

Nematicide influence on cotton yield and plant-parasitic nematodes in conventional and sod-based crop rotation

., 2018). Several studies have shown that plant-parasitic nematode populations decrease after nematicide treatments in horticultural crop production (Carrascosa et al., 2014; Coleman and Wall, 2015). However, there is a desire to minimize nematicide application because of cost and potential negative environmental impacts associated with its use (Khanal et al., 2018). Fluopyram is the active ingredient in a nematicide recently made available in cotton production. Most nematicides work by disrupting

Lesley A. Schumacher, Zane J. Grabau, David L. Wright, Ian M. Small, Hui-Ling Liao

Journal of Nematology, Volume 52 , 1–14

research-article | 06-November-2020

Plant health evaluations of Belonolaimus longicaudatus and Meloidogyne incognita colonized bermudagrass using remote sensing

setting during the study. Nematicides used were: (i) abamectin (Divanem; Syngenta, Greensboro, NC) at 0.89 L/ha; (ii) fluopyram (Indemnify; Bayer Environmental Science, Cary, NC) at 1.25 L/ha; (iii) fluensulfone (Nimitz Pro G; Control Solutions International, Pasadena, TX) at 134 kg/ha; and (iv) furfural (Multiguard Protect; Agriguard Company, LLC, Cranford, NJ) at 75 L/ha. An untreated treatment was included as the control. Abamectin, fluopyram, fluensulfone, and furfural were applied once at the

Will L. Groover, Kathy S. Lawrence

Journal of Nematology, Volume 52 , 1–13

research-article | 30-November-2019

New reduced-risk agricultural nematicides - rationale and review

AChE Danger* Ivermectin/Abamectin 1981 (JPN) Lactone GluCl Danger Spirotetramat 2008 (US) Tetramic acid LBI Caution DMDS 2010 (US) Fumigant Multi-site Danger* Methyl iodide 2007 (US) Fumigant Multi-site Danger** Allyl ITC 2013 (US) Fumigant Multi-site Danger Tioxazafen (seed) 2017 (US) Oxadiazole Unknown Caution* Fluensulfone 2014 (US) Thizaole Unknown Caution Fluopyram 2010 (US), 2013 (HND) Benzamide SDHI Caution Fluazaindolizine 2020? Carboxamide Unknown Caution Notes

Johan Desaeger, Catherine Wram, Inga Zasada

Journal of Nematology, Volume 52 , 1–16

No Record Found..
Page Actions