ANALYSIS OF THE CITY TRANSPORT SYSTEM’S DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY DESIGN PRINCIPLES WITH ACCOUNT OF RISKS AND SPECIFIC FEATURES OF SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Transport Problems

Silesian University of Technology

Subject: Economics, Transportation, Transportation Science & Technology

GET ALERTS

eISSN: 2300-861X

DESCRIPTION

30
Reader(s)
50
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 1 (March 2017) > List of articles

ANALYSIS OF THE CITY TRANSPORT SYSTEM’S DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY DESIGN PRINCIPLES WITH ACCOUNT OF RISKS AND SPECIFIC FEATURES OF SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT

Irina MAKAROVA / Ksenia SHUBENKOVA / Larisa GABSALIKHOVA

Keywords : sustainable city transportation system, risk analysis, public transport, non-motorized transport

Citation Information : Transport Problems. Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 125-138, DOI: https://doi.org/10.20858/tp.2017.12.1.12

License : (CC BY 4.0)

Received Date : 12-November-2015 / Accepted: 14-February-2017 / Published Online: 30-March-2017

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

Summary. Transport system is the key indicator of sustainable spatial development, because if it is ineffective it can render the economy, the environment, and society vul-nerable. Despite the large number of already existing research, the city transportation sys-tem’s development strategy design is still a relevant objective, because the existing ways and strategies of the transport development may not always be applicable in certain cir-cumstances. This article presents the possible ways of improvement of sustainability of the city transportation systems adapted in accordance with the peculiarities of Russian cit-ies. It is stated that when working out a city transportation system’s development strategy it is necessary to take into account all possible risks. According to the case study of Na-berezhnye Chelny city, all vulnerabilities of the system that today are typical almost for all Russian cities were analyzed, classification of risks was made, and means of their con-trol were suggested. Solutions proposed as a result of the SWOT-analysis can be used when developing transport strategies for other cities with similar specificity.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

  1. The future we want. Rio de Janeiro: United Nations. 2012. Available at: http://www.uncsd2012.org/content/documents/370The%20Future%20We%20Want%2010Jan%20clean%20_no%20brackets.pdf.
  2. The Global Goals for Sustainable Development. Available at: http://www.globalgoals.org/global-goals/sustainable-cities-and-communities.
  3. Paris Declaration. City in motion: People first. Geneva: United Nations Publications. 2015. Available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/thepep/Publications/2015/Paris_Declaration_in_English_Final.pdf.
  4. Global Green new Deal. Policy Brief. UNEP. March 2009. Available at: http://www.unep.org/pdf/GGND_Final_Report.pdf.
  5. Smart Cities and Communities. The European Innovation Partnership on Smart Cities and Com-munities. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eip/smartcities/.
  6. European Innovation Partnership on Smart Cities and Communities. Available at: https://eu-smartcities.eu/sites/all/files/EIP-SCC%20Brochure.pdf.
  7. Rajak, S. & Parthiban, P. & Dhanalakshmi, R. Sustainable transportation systems performance evaluation using fuzzy logic. Ecological Indicators. 2016. No. 71. P. 503-513.
  8. Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0. Available at: http://www.wbcsd.org/Projects/smp2.
  9. Integrated sustainable mobility in cities – a practical guide. Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2016. Available at: http://wbcsdpublications.org/project/smp2-0-final-report-integrated-sustainable-mobility-in-cities-a-practical-guide/.
  10. Larsen, J. & Patterson, Z. & El-Geneidy, A. Build It. But Where? The Use of Geographic Infor-mation Systems in Identifying Locations for New Cycling Infrastructure. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 2013. Vol. 7. P. 299-317.
  11. Forsyth, A. & Krizek, K. Urban Design: Is there a Distinctive View from the Bicycle? Journal of Urban Design. 2011. Vol. 16. P. 531-549.
  12. Heinen, E. & Handy, S. Similarities in Attitudes and Norms and the Effect on Bicycle Commut-ing: Evidence from the Bicycle Cities Davis and Delft. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 2012. Vol. 6. P. 257-281.
  13. The path to a livable city. Transportation for a Livable City. 2002. Available at: https://livablecity.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/tlc_path.pdf.
  14. Improving bus service. Modest investments to increase transit ridership. 2012. 68 p. Available at: http://www.fcm.ca/Documents/tools/GMF/Transport_Canada/ImprovingBusService_EN.pdf
  15. Public Transport Plan. Transport @ 3.5 Million. Department of Transport. Wester Australia. 2015. Available at: http://www.transport.wa.gov.au/mediaFiles/projects/ PROJ_P_Road_Network__Plan.pdf
  16. Vuchic, V.R. Transportation for livable cities. Center for Urban Policy Research. 1999. 352 p.
  17. Medeiros, R. & Duarte, F. Policy to promote bicycle use or bicycle to promote politicians? Bicy-cles in the imagery of urban mobility in Brazil. Urban, Planning and Transport Research: An Open Access Journal. 2013. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 28-39.
  18. 4 Cities Developing the World's Best Sustainable Transport Systems. Available at: http://www.fastcoexist.com/3025399/4-cities-developing-the-worlds-best-sustainable-transport-systems.
  19. Pardo, C.F. & Jiemian, Y. & Hongyuan, Y. & Mohanty, Ch.R. Shanghai Manual – A Guide for Sustainable Urban Development in the 21st Century. 2012. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=633&menu=35.
  20. Ferbrache, F. & Knowles, R.D. Generating opportunities for city sustainability through invest-ments in light rail systems: Introduction to the Special Section on light rail and urban sustainabil-ity. Journal of Transport Geography. 2016. Vol. 54. P. 369-372.
  21. Steurer, N. & Bonilla, D. Building sustainable transport futures for the Mexico City Metropolitan Area. Transport Policy. 2016. Vol. 52. P. 121-133.
  22. Sustainable transport in cities. Carbon trust. Available at: https://www.carbontrust.com/news/2015/01/sustainable-transport-cities/.
  23. European Urban Roadmap 2030: on-line tool for the assessment of sustainable urban transport policies. International Energy Agency. Available at: http://urban-transport-roadmaps.eu/.
  24. WHITE PAPER. Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, 28.3.2011.
    Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0144&from=EN.
  25. Allen, B. Integrating Australia’s Transport Systems: A Strategy for an Efficient Transport Future. 2012. Infrastructure Partnerships Australia Available at: http://infrastructure.org.au/.
  26. Introduction to Multi-Modal Transportation Planning: Principles and Practices. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. 22 May 2014. Available at: http://www.vtpi.org/multimodal_planning.pdf.
  27. Sustainable Urban Transport: Aviod-Shift-Improve (A-S-I). Deutsche Gesellschhaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). Available at: http://www.sutp.org/files/contents/documents/resources/E_Fact-Sheets-and-Policy-Briefs/SUTP_GIZ_FS_Avoid-Shift-Improve_EN.pdf.
  28. A roadmap towards sustainable mobility in Breda. International Scientific Conference on Mobility and Transport. Mobil. TUM 2014. Available at: http://www.mobil-tum.vt.bgu.tum.de/fileadmin/w00bqi/www/Session_3/Bos_Themme.pdf.
  29. Global Report on Human Settlements. UN-HABITAT. 2013. Available at: http://unhabitat.org/books/planning-and-design-for-sustainable-urban-mobility-global-report-on-human-settlements-2013/.
  30. Dooley, T. A better deal for commuters. Fianna Fáil Spokesperson on Transport, Tourism & Sport. Ireland. February 2016. 15 p.
  31. Global status report on road safety 2015. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. Sep-tember 2015. Available at: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2015/GSRRS2015_Summary_EN_final.pdf.
  32. Preparation of the Fourth High-level Meeting on Transport, Health and Environment. United Nations Publications. 2014. Available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/thepep/documents/2012/ECE.AC.21.SC.2012.3_E.pdf.
  33. Bredal, F. The Case of Copenhagen. In: Changing urban traffic and the role of bicycles: Russian and International Experiences. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Moscow. 2014. P. 24-28.
  34. Tahkola, P. The Case of Oulu. In: Changing urban traffic and the role of bicycles: Russian and International Experiences. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Moscow. 2014. P. 29-43.
  35. Appenzeller, M. Cycling – Past, Present and Future. In: Changing urban traffic and the role of bicy-cles: Russian and International Experiences. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Moscow. 2014. P. 11-18.
  36. Public Transport Strategy. Available at: http://www.eastriding.gov.uk/planning/pdf/chapter_7.pdf.
  37. Guidelines for Attractive Public Transport with a Focus on BRT. Stockholm. January 2015. Available at: brt_guidelines_eng_0.pdf.
  38. Dublin Transport Map. Available at: http://www.venetikidis.com/ArisV/DUBLIN_TRANSPORT_MAP.html.
  39. Public Transport – an Attractive Alternative. Ministry of Transport and Communications. Finland. 2002. Printed by Erweko, 2002 Available at: http://www.mintc.fi/.
  40. Global reduction in CO2 emissions from cars: a consumer’s perspective. Policy recommendations for decision makers. FIA Mobility, Paris, November 2015. 10 p.
  41. Smart cities Preliminary Report. 2014. Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/smart_cities_report-jtc1.pdf
  42. Clean transport, Urban transport. European Commission. Programmes and projects. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/urban/programmes_projects_en.
  43. Mobility as a Service (MaaS). Available at: http://maas.global/maas-as-a-concept/.
  44. Smart sustainable mobility. A user-friendly transport system is a combination of intelligence, low carbon energy, and adaptable services. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. 2014.
    Available at: http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/visions/2014/V5.pdf.
  45. Going Green: Nottingham's hi-tech transport becomes EU model. Available at: https://phys.org/news/2015-07-green-nottingham-hi-tech-eu.html.
  46. Makarova, I. & Khabibullin, R. & Belyaev, E. & Mavrin, V. Intelligent Transportation Systems – Problems and Perspectives, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. 2015. Vol. 32. P. 37-80. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19150-8.
  47. Стратегия социальноэкономического развития муниципального образования город Набе- режные Челны до 2021 года и на период до 2030 года. Набережные Челны. 2016. Available at: http://nabchelny.ru/upload/files/user/20302.pdf [In Russian: The Strategy of social and eco-nomic development of Naberezhnye Chelny city till 2030].
  48. Koplyay, T. & Mitchell, B & Cohn, S. & Fekete, M. Risk profiles of emerging established value chains in dynamic markets. In: IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2015. P. 521-528.
  49. J Hallikas, J. & Karvonen, I. & Pulkkinen, U. & Virolainen, V.M. & Tuominen, M. Risk man-agement processes in supplier networks. International Journal of Production Economics. 2004. Vol. 90. P. 47-58.
  50. Mussigmann, N. & Kersten, W. & Blecker, T. Mitigating Risk during Strategic Supply Network Modelling. Managing Risk in Supply Chains. 2006. Vol. 1. P. 213-226.
  51. Tuncel, G. & Alpan, G. A high level Petri net based modeling approach for risk management in supply chain networks. In: Proceedings of the 21st European Simulation and Modeling Confer-ence. Malta. 2007. P. 178-185.
  52. Tuncel, G. How can risks be managed in logistics networks. In: Dangerous Materials: Control, Risk Prevention and Crisis Management. 2010. P. 93-100.
  53. Kaddoussi, A. & Zoghlami, N. & Zgaya, H. & Hammadi, S. & Bretaudeau, F. Disruption Man-agement Optimization for Military Logistics. In: IFIP Advances in Information and Communica-tion Technology. 2011. P. 61-66.

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS