FUZZY EXPERT SYSTEM FOR ADAPTIVE VESSEL TRAFFIC CONTROL ON ONE-WAY SECTION ON NAVIGABLE CANAL

Publications

Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Transport Problems

Silesian University of Technology

Subject: Economics, Transportation, Transportation Science & Technology

GET ALERTS

eISSN: 2300-861X

DESCRIPTION

6
Reader(s)
11
Visit(s)
0
Comment(s)
0
Share(s)

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 4 (December 2019) > List of articles

FUZZY EXPERT SYSTEM FOR ADAPTIVE VESSEL TRAFFIC CONTROL ON ONE-WAY SECTION ON NAVIGABLE CANAL

Vladimir BUGARSKI / Todor BAČKALIĆ * / Željko KANOVIĆ / Filip KULIĆ / Miloš ZEKOVIĆ

Keywords : vessel traffic; one-way section; fuzzy expert system; adaptive control

Citation Information : Transport Problems. Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 39-50, DOI: https://doi.org/10.20858/tp.2019.14.4.4

License : (CC BY 4.0)

Received Date : 16-April-2018 / Accepted: 04-October-2019 / Published Online: 08-December-2019

ARTICLE

ABSTRACT

This paper analyses the management process of the vessel traffic control on one-way section on navigable canal with the adaptive time-sequential filter (traffic lights). One-way section on canal significantly decreases waterway capacity and requests special attention in control and regulation of the vessel traffic. The vessel traffic is a stochastic variable, and the vessel traffic control needs to be flexible and adaptive in order to achieve the required traffic flow with minimal delays. On the one-way section, two independent variable vessel flows from opposite directions are encountered, and fixed (predefined) signal plans lead to an increase in vessel delays. An appropriate solution is development of a Fuzzy Control System (FCS) for the vessel traffic control. A control algorithm is designed according to a set of linguistic rules that describes input parameters for the control strategy. The estimated and approximate input parameters are implemented in the algorithm as fuzzy sets. The final result of the developed algorithm is the traffic light scheme (duration of green light for certain direction). The presented control system can be used as an adaptive automatic control system for the vessel traffic control processes on navigable canals or on critical sections of other waterways.

Content not available PDF Share

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCES

1. Stopford, M. Maritime economics. Third Edition. Routledge. 2009. 840 p.

2. Almaz, O.A. & Altiok, T. Simulation modeling of the vessel traffic in Delaware River: Impact of deepening on port performance. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 2012. Vol. 22. P. 146165. 

3. Lübbecke, E. & Lübbecke, M.E. & Möhring, R.H. Ship traffic optimization for the Kiel Canal. Operations Research. 2019. (in press).

4. Tang, G. & Qi, Y. Simulation Modeling for Ship Traffic Flow in Entrance Channel. In: Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. IntechOpen. 2018.

5. Filipowicz, W. Vessel traffic control problems. The Journal of Navigation. 2004. Vol. 57(1). P. 15-24.

6. Wiedemann, G. & Behle, W. & Michael, J. & Plate, U. & Renner, E. & Rumelin, B. & Schroiff, F.J. Report on XXIInd International Navigation Congress, Section I, subject 4. Paris, 1969. P. 5-20.

7. Luo, C. & Liu, M. & Liu, R.R. Optimizing throughput of restricted tidal waters: Composite ship and time domain model and its applications. In: Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting. Washington DC, 2017.

8. Liu, J. & Zhou, F. & Li, Z. & Wang, M. & Liu, R.W. Dynamic ship domain models for capacity analysis of restricted water channels. The Journal of Navigation. 2016. Vol. 69(3). P. 481-503.

9. Wang, W. & Peng, Y. & Song, X. & Zhou, Y. Impact of navigational safety level on seaport fairway capacity. The Journal of Navigation. 2015. Vol. 68(6). P. 1120-1132.

10. Rahimikelarijani, B. & Abedi, A. & Hamidi, M. & Cho, J. Simulation modeling of Houston Ship Channel vessel traffic for optimal closure scheduling. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 2018. Vol. 80. P. 89-103.

11. Zhang, J. & Santos, T.A. & Guedes Soares, C. & Yan, X. Sequential ship traffic scheduling model for restricted two-way waterway transportation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. 2017. Vol. 231(1).  P. 86-97.

12. Zhang, X. & Chen, X. & Ji, M. & Yao, S. Vessel scheduling model of a one-way port channel. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering. 2017. Vol. 143(5). P. 04017009-01 04017009-11.

13. Lalla-Ruiz, E. & Shi, X. & Voß, S. The waterway ship scheduling problem. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2018. Vol. 60. P. 191-209.

14. Mundy, R. & Campbell, J. & Nauss, R. & Rust, D. & Smith, L.D. & Sweeney II, D.C. Management systems for inland waterway traffic control. Vol. I. Iowa State University. 2005. 103 p.

15. Chen, Y. & Wu, H. & Wen, Z. Study on the propagation and dissipation of inland ship congestion under different control strategies. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2017. Vol. 1839. No. 1.  P. 020139-1 - 020139-8.

16. Xin, X. & Liu, K. & Yang, X. & Yuan, Z. & Zhang, J. A simulation model for ship navigation in the “Xiazhimen” waterway based on statistical analysis of AIS data. Ocean Engineering. 2019. Vol. 180. P. 279-289.

17. Бачкалић, Т. Управљање саобраћајем на вештачким пловним путевима ограничених димензија у функцији њихове пропусне способности. Докторска дисертација. Универзитет у Новом Саду. 2001. [In Serbian: Bačkalić, T. Traffic control on artificial waterways with limited dimensions as function of their capacity. PhD thesis. University of Novi Sad, Serbia, 2001].

18. Griffiths, J.D. Queueing at the Suez Canal. The Journal of the Operational Research Society. 1995. Vol. 46. No. 11. P. 1299-1309.

19. Wang, W. & Peng, Y. & Tian, Q. & Song, X. Key influencing factors on improving the waterway through capacity of coastal ports. Ocean Engineering. 2017. Vol. 137. P. 382-393.

20. Figueiredo, J. & Botto, M.A. & Rijo, M. SCADA system with predictive controller applied to irrigation canals. Control Engineering Practice. 2013. Vol. 21(6). P. 870-886.

21. Bugarski, V. & Bačkalić, T. & Kuzmanov, U. Fuzzy decision support system for ship lock control. Expert Systems with Applications. 2013. Vol. 40(10). P. 3953-3960.

22. Bačkalić, T. & Bugarski, V. & Kulić, F. & Kanović, Ž. Adaptable fuzzy expert system for ship lock control support. The Journal of Navigation. 2016. Vol. 69(6). P. 1341-1356.

23. Kanović, Ž. & Bugarski, V. & Bačkalić, T. & Kulić, F. Application of Nature-Inspired Optimization Techniques in Vessel Traffic Control. In: Advances in Nature-Inspired Computing and Applications. Springer, Cham. 2019. P. 223-252.

24. Liang, S. & Yang, X. & Bi, F. & Ye, C. Vessel traffic scheduling method for the controlled waterways in the upper Yangtze River. Ocean Engineering. 2019. Vol. 172. P. 96-104.

25. Zhang, D. & Yan, X. & Zhang, J. & Yang, Z. & Wang, J. Use of fuzzy rule-based evidential reasoning approach in the navigational risk assessment of inland waterway transportation systems. Safety Science. 2016. Vol. 82. P. 352-360.

26. Willems, C. & Schmorak, N. River Information Services on the way to maturity. In: 32nd PIANC International Navigation Congress. Liverpool, United Kingdom, 2010.

27. Camps-Valls, G. & Martín-Guerrero, J.D. & Rojo-Álvarez, J.L. & Soria-Olivas, E. Fuzzy sigmoid kernel for support vector classifiers. Neurocomputing. 2004. Vol. 62. P. 501-506.

28. Tang, G. & Wang, W. & Guo, Z. & Song, X. & Yu, X. & Zhang, Y. Decision Support System for Designing Integrated Coastal Berths and Entrance-Channel Systems. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering. 2016. Vol. 143(1). P. 04016013-1 – 04016013-16.

29. Tang, G. & Zijian, G. & Xuhui, Y. & Xiangqun, S. & Pengcheng, D. SPAC to improve port performance for seaports with very long one-way entrance channels. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering. 2013. Vol. 140(4). P. 04014011-1 – 04014011-8.

EXTRA FILES

COMMENTS