SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT
Citation Information : Transport Problems. Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 45-57, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/tp-2020-019
License : (CC BY 4.0)
Received Date : 02-February-2019 / Accepted: 04-June-2020 / Published Online: 18-June-2020
This paper addresses an application of the specific methods of multi-criteria decision analysis to specify the appropriate supplier of an autonomous train in a certain production–distribution company. This company identifies three potential suppliers dealing with the development and purchase of autonomous train systems. In terms of the multi-criteria decision analysis, the WSA method, the Scoring method and the TOPSIS method were used to define a suitable compromise solution. To apply each method, individual suppliers were sorted depending on the appropriateness for the examined company based on relevance with all the identified criteria and their weights. The evaluation criteria include procurement cost, time of the whole autonomous train system project implementation, references from plants where such a technology has already been introduced, service department availability and battery charge time. Thereafter, the outcomes obtained using individual methods were compared to each other and the compromise supplier of the autonomous train system to be implemented in the selected company was determined.
1. Company Faurecia. 2019. Available at: https://www.faurecia.com/en
2. Pelegrina, G.D. & Duarte, L.T. & Romano, J.M.T. Application of independent component analysis and TOPSIS to deal with dependent criteria in multicriteria decision problems. Expert Systems with Applications. 2019. Vol. 122. P. 262-280.
3. Yu, B. Cai, M. & Li, Q. A λ-rough set model and its applications with TOPSIS method to decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems. 2019. Vol. 165. P. 420-431.
4. Agarski, B. & Hadzistevic, M. & Budak, I. & et al. Comparison of approaches to weighting of multiple criteria for selecting equipment to optimize performance and safety. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. Vol. 25. No. 2. P. 228-240.
5. Yu, C. & Shao, Y. & Wang, K. & Zhang, L. A group decision making sustainable supplier selection approach using extended TOPSIS under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications. 2019. Vol. 121. P. 1-17.
6. Šeba, J. & Hruška, R. & Švadlenka, L. Analysis of automatic identification and data capture systems use in logistics. Logi - Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics. 2016. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 124- 135. ISSN 1804-3216.
7. Bach, M.P. & Zoroja, J. & Loupis, M. RFID usage in European enterprises and its relation to competitiveness: Cluster analysis approach. International Journal of Engineering Business Management. 2016. Vol. 8. P. 1-11.
8. Plakhin, A. & Kampf, R. & Ogorodnikova, E. & et al. Localization strategies of the Czech companies on the basis of industrial-logistics parks in the Sverdlovsk region. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2017. Vol. 134.
9. Hruška, R. & Průša, P. & Babić, D. The use of AHP method for selection of supplier. Transport. 2014. Vol. 29. No. 2. P. 195-203.
10. Jeřábek, K. & Majercak, P. & Kliestik, T. & et al. Application of Clark and Wright´s savings algorithm model to solve routing problem in supply logistics. Nase More. 2016. Vol. 63. No. 3. P. 115-119.
11. Houska, M. Reply to the paper 'Multi-criteria analysis of economic activity for European Union member states and candidate countries: TOPSIS and WSA applications' by S. E. Dincer. European Journal of Social Sciences. 2012. Vol. 30. No. 2. P. 290-295.
12. Adetunji, O. & Bischoff, J. & Willy, C.J. Managing system obsolescence via multicriteria decision making. Systems Engineering. 2018. Vol. 21. No. 4. P. 307-321.
13. Dockalikova, I. & Klozikova, J. MCDM Methods in Practice: Localization Suitable Places for Company by the Utilization of AHP and WSA, TOPSIS Method. In: Proceedings of the Conference on European Management Leadership and Governance. MilitaryAcademy, Lisbon, Portugal. 2015. P. 543-552.
14. Kauf, S. & Tłuczak, A. Allocation of logistic risk-investment in public-private-partnership - Use of fuzzy TOPSIS method. In: MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018.
15. Rashidi, K. & Cullinane, K. A comparison of fuzzy DEA and fuzzy TOPSIS in sustainable supplier selection: Implications for sourcing strategy. Expert Systems with Applications. 2019. Vol. 121. P. 266-281.
16. Droździel, P. & Komsta, H. & Krzywonos, L. An analysis of costs of vehicle repairs in a transportation company. Part I. Transport Problems. 2012. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 67-75.
17. Ližbetinová, L. & Kampf, R. & Ližbetin, J. Requirements of a transport system user. Communications: scientific letters of the University of Žilina. 2012. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 106-108. ISSN 1335-4205.
18. Ližbetin, J. & Černá, L. & Ľoch, M. Model evaluation of suppliers in terms of real company for selected criteria. Nase More. 2015. Vol. 62. P. 147-152.
19. Kampf, R. & Lorincová, S. & Hitka, M. & Caha, Z. The application of ABC analysis to inventories in the automatic industry utilizing the cost saving effect. Nase More. 2016. Vol. 63. P. 120-125.
20. He, C. & Mao, J. AGV optimal path planning based on improved ant colony algorithm. MATEC Web Conference. 2018. Vol. 232. Art. no. 03052. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201823203052.
21. Fedorko, G. & Molnar, V. & Vasil, M. & Hanzl. J. Application of the Tecnomatix Plant Simulation Program to Modelling the Handling of Ocean Containers using the AGV System. Nase More. 2018. Vol. 65. No. 4. P. 230-236. DOI: 10.17818/NM/2018/4SI.12.
22. Hilmani, A. & Maizate, A. & Hassouni, L. Multi-criteria analysis and advanced comparative study of self-organization protocols in wireless sensor network. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 13. P. 5168-5180.
23. Sun, Y., Su, T. & Tu, Z. Faster R-CNN based autonomous navigation for vehicles in warehouse. In: IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. AIM. Munich, Germany, 3-7 July 2017. P. 1639-1644. DOI: 10.1109/AIM.2017.8014253.
24. Lubikowski, K. & Radkowski, S. The project of shoulder of the suspension system for autonomous platform. The Archives of Automotive Engineering – Archiwum Motoryzacji. 2017. Vol. 751. No. 1. P. 85-92. DOI: 10.14669/AM.VOL75.ART5.
25. Ding, B. & Qu, X. & Song, W. A new collaboration distribution network base on third party logistics alliance. Advanced Materials Research. 2012. Vol. 403-408. P. 2772-2775. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.403-408.2772.
26. Georgiou, D. & Mohammed, E.S. & Rozakis, S. Multi-criteria decision making on the energy supply configuration of autonomous desalination units. Renewable Energy. 2015. Vol. 75. P. 459-467. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.036.
27. Kampf, R. & Hlatka, M. & Savin, G. Proposal for optimizing specific distribution routes by means of the specific method of operational analysis. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina. 2017. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 133-138.
28. Albus, J. & Bostelman, R. & Madhavan, R. & Scott, H. & Barbera, T. & Szabo, S. & Hong, T. & Chang, T. & Shackleford, W. & Shneier, M. & Balakirsky, S. & Schlenoff, C. & Huang, H.M. & Proctor, F. Intelligent control of mobility systems. Studies in Computational Intelligence. 2008. Vol. 132. P. 237-274. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-79257-4_13.
29. Wang, S. & Li, Z. Exploring the mechanism of crashes with automated vehicles using statistical modeling approaches. PLoS ONE. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 3. Article number e0214550. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214550.