Share / Export Citation / Email / Print / Text size:

Transport Problems

Silesian University of Technology

Subject: Economics, Transportation, Transportation Science & Technology


eISSN: 2300-861X



VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 3 (September 2021) > List of articles


Andrej GULIČ *

Keywords : socio-economic impact assessment (SEIA); new railway line; Slovenia

Citation Information : Transport Problems. Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 153-162, DOI:

License : (CC BY 4.0)

Received Date : 26-April-2020 / Accepted: 13-September-2021 / Published Online: 30-September-2021



Socio-Economic Impact Assessment (SEIA) represents the most widely used tool for determining the potential current and future social and economic impacts of proposed infrastructure and other development projects and for developing appropriate policies and measures by which the identified adverse effects can be mitigated or eliminated, and positive social and economic impacts can be effectively capitalized on for the benefit of communities in which the projects are spatially located. In Slovenia, SEIA is not legally binding; for this reason, its use depends on the content and nature of specific development projects as well as on the assessments of the contracting entity. In this paper, the results of a partial SEIA of the new railway link site selection in the Pomurska region on the route Bad Radkersburg (A) - Murska Sobota (SLO) are presented. The assessment was carried out at three hierarchical territorial levels: at the level of EU, the Republics of Slovenia and Austria; at a wider cross-border level that includes the Austrian Province of Styria and the Slovenian Podravska and Pomurska regions; and at a narrower cross-border level, covering the area between the Austrian town Bad Radkersburg and the Slovenian town Murska Sobota, also including some other important settlements on the Slovenian side of the border. For the purpose of the analysis, we prepared a proposal for four corridors of the new railway line on the route Bad Radkersburg - Murska Sobota. The proposed corridors were evaluated considering the set of seven selected criteria and three evaluation parameters. With the help of the implementation of partial SEIA, we selected the most suitable corridor for the prospective new railway line in this part of Slovenia. We ascertain that SEIA is an appropriate instrument for evaluating the social, economic, and partly also spatial impacts of transport infrastructure planning and construction. Therefore, we suggest that it would be advisable to consider its future inclusion in the relevant legal and regulatory framework in Slovenia.

Content not available PDF Share



1. Arora, A. & Tiwari, G. A Handbook for Socio-economic Impact Assessment (SEIA) of Future Urban Transport (FUT) Projects. Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Program (TRIPP). Indian Institute of Technology. New Delhi. 2007. 98 p.

2. Association of European Border Regions - AEBR. Statement on the Green Paper: TEN-T: a policy review. Gronau. 2009. 9 p.

3. Becker, H. & Vanclay, F. The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment: Conceptual and Methodological Advances. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc. 2003. 315 p.

4. Commission of the European Communities. Green Paper - TEN-T: A policy review - Towards a better integrated transeuropean transport network at the service of the common transport policy. Brussels. 2009. 19 p.

5. European Commission. White paper - Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area - Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. Brussels. 2011. 30 p.

6. European Parliament. Green Paper on the future of TEN-T. European Parliament resolution of 22 April 2009 on the Green Paper on the future TEN-T policy (2008/2218(INI)). Strasbourg. 2009. 40 p.

7. Gulič, A. Socio-economic impact assessment of railway connection establishment between Bad Radkersburg - Murska Sobota: Socio-economic research. Final research report. Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia. Ljubljana. 2012. 79 p.

8. Ha-Duong, M. & Nguyën, L.A. & Strange, T. & Truong, A.H. Social acceptability of large infrastructure projects in Vietnam. Field Actions Science Reports. Special Issue 14. 2016. 11 p.

9. Lawrence, D.P. Environmental Impact Assessment: Practical Solutions to Recurrent Problems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2003. 576 p.

10. National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia. Social plan of the SR of Slovenia for the period 1986-1990 with amendments. Official Gazette of the RS. 2004. No. 76/04. 85 p. Ljubljana.

11. National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia. Resolution on the national program for the development of transport in the Republic of Slovenia for the period up to 2030. Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia. 2016. No. 75/16. 48 p. Ljubljana.

12. PNZ, IBK et al. Študija izvedljivosti vzpostavitve železniške infrastrukture do novega V. koridorja na relaciji Bad Radkersburg – Murska Sobota. Naročniki Univerza v Mariboru, Fakulteta za logistiko. Mestna občina Murska Sobota. Občina Tišina. Ljubljana in Beljak. 2012. [In Slovenian: Feasibility study for the establishment of railway infrastructure to the new V. corridor on the route Bad Radkersburg - Murska Sobota].

13. Radej, B. Presoja socialnih vplivov. In: Radej, B. & Golobič, M. & Macur, M. & Dragoš, S. (red.): Vrednotenje politik: obzorja nove miselnosti. Založba Vega. Ljubljana. 2011. 248 p. [In Slovenian: Social impact assessment].

14. RDA Mura. Regional development programme for the Pomurska region 2014-2020. Murska Sobota. 2015. 186 p.

15. Teply, S. & Allingham, D.I. & Richardson, D.B. & Stephenson, B.W. Canadian Capacity Guide for Signalized Intersections. Third Edition. Washington: Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2008. 230 p.

16. Taylor, C.N. & Bryan, C.H. & Goodrich, C.G. Social Assessment: theory, process & techniques. Taylor Baines and Associates, Christchurch. 1995. 232 p.

17. Vanclay, F. Social Impact Assessment: International Principles. IAIA Special Publications Series No. 2. May 2003. International Association for Impact Assessment. 2003. 4 p.

18. Vanclay, F. & Esteves, A.M. New Directions in Social Assessment: Conceptual and Methodological Advances. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham. UK. 2011. 382 p.

19. Wagale, M. & Singh, A.P. & Sarkar, A.K. Socio-economic impacts of low-volume roads using a mixed-method approach of PCA and Fuzzy-TOPSIS. International review for spatial planning and sustainable development A: Planning Strategies and Design Concepts. 2021. Vol. 9. No. 2. 21 p.